O:9:"MagpieRSS":23:{s:6:"parser";i:0;s:12:"current_item";a:0:{}s:5:"items";a:10:{i:0;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:91:"JPL-made Ingenuity helicopter spots wreckage of Perseverance rover’s landing gear on Mars";s:4:"link";s:118:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/jpl-made-ingenuity-helicopter-spots-wreckage-of-perseverance-rovers-landing-gear-on-mars/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:54:25 +0000";s:8:"category";s:77:"SpacegearHelicopterIngenuityJPLmadelandingMarsPerseveranceroversspotswreckage";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=42089";s:11:"description";s:732:"An image taken by the JPL-built Ingenuity helicopter on April 19, 2022, on Mars shows the Perseverance rover’s striped parachute and cone-shaped backshell that helped protect the craft on the trip from Earth to Mars — including during its fiery descent to the red planet’s surface. (Image courtesy of NASA/JPL) The Ingenuity helicopter has captured ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:5107:"

The Ingenuity helicopter has captured a unique bird’s-eye perspective of the gear that helped land the Perseverance rover on Mars.

During its one-year anniversary flight on April 19, the little Jet Propulsion Laboratory-built chopper took photos of the striped parachute used during Perseverance’s landing — often referred to as “7 minutes of terror” because it happens faster than radio signals can reach Earth from Mars — on February 18, 2021. It also spotted the cone-shaped backshell that helped protect the rover and Ingenuity on the trip from Earth to Mars and during its fiery, plunging descent to the Martian surface.

The engineers working on the Mars Sample Return program, an ambitious and multimission process to return Martian samples collected by Perseverance to Earth by the 2030s, asked if Ingenuity could gather these images during its 26th flight.

Studying the components that allowed for a safe landing can help them prepare for future missions to the red planet that will require landing and even launching from the Martian surface for the first time.

“NASA extended Ingenuity flight operations to perform pioneering flights such as this,” said Teddy Tzanetos, Ingenuity’s team lead at JPL in Pasadena.

“Every time we’re airborne, Ingenuity covers new ground and offers a perspective no previous planetary mission could achieve. Mars Sample Return’s reconnaissance request is a perfect example of the utility of aerial platforms on Mars.”

During entry, descent and landing, the spacecraft faces scorching temperatures and gravitational forces as it plunges into the Martian atmosphere at almost 12,500 miles per hour.

Previously, we’ve only seen images of the discarded landing gear from a rover’s perspective, like an image taken by Perseverance showing the parachute and backshell from a distance. Aerial images, captured for the first time by Ingenuity from 26 feet in the air, provide more detail.

“Perseverance had the best-documented Mars landing in history, with cameras showing everything from parachute inflation to touchdown,” said Ian Clark, former Perseverance systems engineer and current Mars Sample Return ascent phase lead at JPL, in a statement.

“But Ingenuity’s images offer a different vantage point. If they either reinforce that our systems worked as we think they worked or provide even one dataset of engineering information we can use for Mars Sample Return planning, it will be amazing. And if not, the pictures are still phenomenal and inspiring.”

The backshell can be seen among a debris field it created after hitting the Martian surface while moving at about 78 miles per hour. But the backshell’s protective coating appears to be intact, as are the 80 suspension lines connecting it to the parachute.

The orange and white parachute can be seen, covered in dust, but the canopy doesn’t show any damage. It was the biggest parachute used on Mars to date, at 70.5 feet wide. The team will continue to analyze the images to determine if the parachute experienced any changes over the next several weeks.

During Ingenuity’s 26th aerial excursion, the chopper flew a total of 1,181 feet. So far, it has logged 49 minutes of total flight time and traveled 3.9 miles over the past year.

“To get the shots we needed, Ingenuity did a lot of maneuvering, but we were confident because there was complicated maneuvering on flights 10, 12, and 13,” said Håvard Grip, chief pilot of Ingenuity at JPL, in a statement. “Our landing spot set us up nicely to image an area of interest for the Perseverance science team on Flight 27, near ‘Séítah’ ridge.”

We want to thank the writer of this post for this incredible web content

JPL-made Ingenuity helicopter spots wreckage of Perseverance rover’s landing gear on Mars

";}s:7:"summary";s:732:"An image taken by the JPL-built Ingenuity helicopter on April 19, 2022, on Mars shows the Perseverance rover’s striped parachute and cone-shaped backshell that helped protect the craft on the trip from Earth to Mars — including during its fiery descent to the red planet’s surface. (Image courtesy of NASA/JPL) The Ingenuity helicopter has captured ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:5107:"

The Ingenuity helicopter has captured a unique bird’s-eye perspective of the gear that helped land the Perseverance rover on Mars.

During its one-year anniversary flight on April 19, the little Jet Propulsion Laboratory-built chopper took photos of the striped parachute used during Perseverance’s landing — often referred to as “7 minutes of terror” because it happens faster than radio signals can reach Earth from Mars — on February 18, 2021. It also spotted the cone-shaped backshell that helped protect the rover and Ingenuity on the trip from Earth to Mars and during its fiery, plunging descent to the Martian surface.

The engineers working on the Mars Sample Return program, an ambitious and multimission process to return Martian samples collected by Perseverance to Earth by the 2030s, asked if Ingenuity could gather these images during its 26th flight.

Studying the components that allowed for a safe landing can help them prepare for future missions to the red planet that will require landing and even launching from the Martian surface for the first time.

“NASA extended Ingenuity flight operations to perform pioneering flights such as this,” said Teddy Tzanetos, Ingenuity’s team lead at JPL in Pasadena.

“Every time we’re airborne, Ingenuity covers new ground and offers a perspective no previous planetary mission could achieve. Mars Sample Return’s reconnaissance request is a perfect example of the utility of aerial platforms on Mars.”

During entry, descent and landing, the spacecraft faces scorching temperatures and gravitational forces as it plunges into the Martian atmosphere at almost 12,500 miles per hour.

Previously, we’ve only seen images of the discarded landing gear from a rover’s perspective, like an image taken by Perseverance showing the parachute and backshell from a distance. Aerial images, captured for the first time by Ingenuity from 26 feet in the air, provide more detail.

“Perseverance had the best-documented Mars landing in history, with cameras showing everything from parachute inflation to touchdown,” said Ian Clark, former Perseverance systems engineer and current Mars Sample Return ascent phase lead at JPL, in a statement.

“But Ingenuity’s images offer a different vantage point. If they either reinforce that our systems worked as we think they worked or provide even one dataset of engineering information we can use for Mars Sample Return planning, it will be amazing. And if not, the pictures are still phenomenal and inspiring.”

The backshell can be seen among a debris field it created after hitting the Martian surface while moving at about 78 miles per hour. But the backshell’s protective coating appears to be intact, as are the 80 suspension lines connecting it to the parachute.

The orange and white parachute can be seen, covered in dust, but the canopy doesn’t show any damage. It was the biggest parachute used on Mars to date, at 70.5 feet wide. The team will continue to analyze the images to determine if the parachute experienced any changes over the next several weeks.

During Ingenuity’s 26th aerial excursion, the chopper flew a total of 1,181 feet. So far, it has logged 49 minutes of total flight time and traveled 3.9 miles over the past year.

“To get the shots we needed, Ingenuity did a lot of maneuvering, but we were confident because there was complicated maneuvering on flights 10, 12, and 13,” said Håvard Grip, chief pilot of Ingenuity at JPL, in a statement. “Our landing spot set us up nicely to image an area of interest for the Perseverance science team on Flight 27, near ‘Séítah’ ridge.”

We want to thank the writer of this post for this incredible web content

JPL-made Ingenuity helicopter spots wreckage of Perseverance rover’s landing gear on Mars

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1651179265;}i:1;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:47:"There is a lot to be gained by working overseas";s:4:"link";s:77:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/there-is-a-lot-to-be-gained-by-working-overseas/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:53:36 +0000";s:8:"category";s:22:"Spacegainedlotoverseas";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41950";s:11:"description";s:580:"Many years ago, I left school one December, with a guaranteed place at university for the following September, with the challenge of filling the intervening months in an interesting way. A common choice these days might be to go for a “gap year” of travel, roaming around a variety of countries to learn something about ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:8705:"

Many years ago, I left school one December, with a guaranteed place at university for the following September, with the challenge of filling the intervening months in an interesting way. A common choice these days might be to go for a “gap year” of travel, roaming around a variety of countries to learn something about them. Back then, though, travel was not so easy, so I opted for something nearer to home.

Since there was a parliamentary by-election in the constituency in which I lived, I devoted the first months to learning the nitty-gritty of campaigning, from delivering leaflets to knocking on doors and the rest of it. Then I worked as a woodcutter, helping to clear the route for a new electricity power line, until the boss felt that my lack of skill with an axe was endangering both me and fellow workers.

Then, for a couple of months, I commuted daily by train to London to work in the offices of an insurance company. One lasting benefit was that I realised I never wanted to do anything like that again. This was followed by a bit of travel and a bit more politics. When I finally got to university, I was more mature than I had been as a callow school-leaver.

One of my first university friends, a girl named Helen, had opted for something markedly different, having found a job teaching English in a school in the Nigerian city of Abeokuta. She learnt what it was like to live and work in a completely different society, where other languages, values and cultures were the norm. She dealt with real challenges, in territory that was, at least initially, completely alien to her.

That experience of life overseas – not studying, but living and working – gave her not just invaluable experience, but enormous strengths.

She had thrived on it and when we began our degrees she was much more mature than I. She became one of my closest friends, and remained so, despite the geographical distance between us, until she died a few years ago.

Studying overseas is valuable, of course, but so much more can be gained outside an academic environment, by living, working and competing with others

I thought of Helen the other day when I was chatting with a senior police officer about the nature of police training and whether it properly equipped people to cope with the challenges of operating in our multi-cultural, multi-lingual society.

My friend told me that he had spent a month working with the New York Police Department. During that short period, he said, he had learnt an enormous amount that he would never have been taught here in college. How much more he would have benefited, we agreed, if he had been able to spend a whole year on secondment with NYPD.

The key benefits, we felt, would not have come from New York, as seen in popular film and TV presentations, as being a city rife with armed robberies, shoot-outs and gangsters, but rather from its diversity in terms of its population, its infrastructure and its widely varied challenges in terms of preserving, or trying to preserve, law and order.

The topic of the benefits to be gained from overseas experience, primarily following completion of university studies, is one that I have often discussed over the years, with ministers and senior government officials, with policemen, oil company executives, bankers, university teachers and others.

In very general terms, all have agreed that it would be beneficial, both for people and for society, if more of us living in the UAE spent time living and working in other countries. Studying overseas for one or more degrees is valuable, of course, not just for the qualification, but for the knowledge amassed there. So much more, though, can be gained by living, working and competing, with others, outside the confines of an academic environment. A secondment for a year or two or getting formal employment provides broader opportunities and greater experience.

More from Peter Hellyer

In some areas, this already happens, of course, such as in the oil industry or banking and finance. We can see the benefits from that. Less visible, perhaps, may be the results from the time spent by Emiratis in foreign police forces, or, for that matter, in urban planning or even farming. In some areas it is simply impossible to make progress without working abroad. Space travel? Nuclear physics?

I would like to see more attention paid to encouraging the general principle of work experience overseas. Perhaps some of those unable to perform military service could be offered this option, although it should, of course, be a voluntary programme.

In some industries, perhaps it can be built more overtly into career paths. Perhaps more large foreign companies that export products to the Emirates could be encouraged to offer secondments or jobs. There will be a host of ways in which the promotion of overseas opportunities can be achieved.

There is, in my view, so much to be gained. The Emirates, we are told, is home to some 200 nationalities. All are welcome here. Learning more about their countries, their languages and their way of life could benefit us all.

Published: April 28, 2022, 8:00 AM

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function()n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments);
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘797427810752825’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

We would love to say thanks to the writer of this post for this incredible material

There is a lot to be gained by working overseas

";}s:7:"summary";s:580:"Many years ago, I left school one December, with a guaranteed place at university for the following September, with the challenge of filling the intervening months in an interesting way. A common choice these days might be to go for a “gap year” of travel, roaming around a variety of countries to learn something about ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:8705:"

Many years ago, I left school one December, with a guaranteed place at university for the following September, with the challenge of filling the intervening months in an interesting way. A common choice these days might be to go for a “gap year” of travel, roaming around a variety of countries to learn something about them. Back then, though, travel was not so easy, so I opted for something nearer to home.

Since there was a parliamentary by-election in the constituency in which I lived, I devoted the first months to learning the nitty-gritty of campaigning, from delivering leaflets to knocking on doors and the rest of it. Then I worked as a woodcutter, helping to clear the route for a new electricity power line, until the boss felt that my lack of skill with an axe was endangering both me and fellow workers.

Then, for a couple of months, I commuted daily by train to London to work in the offices of an insurance company. One lasting benefit was that I realised I never wanted to do anything like that again. This was followed by a bit of travel and a bit more politics. When I finally got to university, I was more mature than I had been as a callow school-leaver.

One of my first university friends, a girl named Helen, had opted for something markedly different, having found a job teaching English in a school in the Nigerian city of Abeokuta. She learnt what it was like to live and work in a completely different society, where other languages, values and cultures were the norm. She dealt with real challenges, in territory that was, at least initially, completely alien to her.

That experience of life overseas – not studying, but living and working – gave her not just invaluable experience, but enormous strengths.

She had thrived on it and when we began our degrees she was much more mature than I. She became one of my closest friends, and remained so, despite the geographical distance between us, until she died a few years ago.

Studying overseas is valuable, of course, but so much more can be gained outside an academic environment, by living, working and competing with others

I thought of Helen the other day when I was chatting with a senior police officer about the nature of police training and whether it properly equipped people to cope with the challenges of operating in our multi-cultural, multi-lingual society.

My friend told me that he had spent a month working with the New York Police Department. During that short period, he said, he had learnt an enormous amount that he would never have been taught here in college. How much more he would have benefited, we agreed, if he had been able to spend a whole year on secondment with NYPD.

The key benefits, we felt, would not have come from New York, as seen in popular film and TV presentations, as being a city rife with armed robberies, shoot-outs and gangsters, but rather from its diversity in terms of its population, its infrastructure and its widely varied challenges in terms of preserving, or trying to preserve, law and order.

The topic of the benefits to be gained from overseas experience, primarily following completion of university studies, is one that I have often discussed over the years, with ministers and senior government officials, with policemen, oil company executives, bankers, university teachers and others.

In very general terms, all have agreed that it would be beneficial, both for people and for society, if more of us living in the UAE spent time living and working in other countries. Studying overseas for one or more degrees is valuable, of course, not just for the qualification, but for the knowledge amassed there. So much more, though, can be gained by living, working and competing, with others, outside the confines of an academic environment. A secondment for a year or two or getting formal employment provides broader opportunities and greater experience.

More from Peter Hellyer

In some areas, this already happens, of course, such as in the oil industry or banking and finance. We can see the benefits from that. Less visible, perhaps, may be the results from the time spent by Emiratis in foreign police forces, or, for that matter, in urban planning or even farming. In some areas it is simply impossible to make progress without working abroad. Space travel? Nuclear physics?

I would like to see more attention paid to encouraging the general principle of work experience overseas. Perhaps some of those unable to perform military service could be offered this option, although it should, of course, be a voluntary programme.

In some industries, perhaps it can be built more overtly into career paths. Perhaps more large foreign companies that export products to the Emirates could be encouraged to offer secondments or jobs. There will be a host of ways in which the promotion of overseas opportunities can be achieved.

There is, in my view, so much to be gained. The Emirates, we are told, is home to some 200 nationalities. All are welcome here. Learning more about their countries, their languages and their way of life could benefit us all.

Published: April 28, 2022, 8:00 AM

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function()n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments);
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)(window, document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘797427810752825’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

We would love to say thanks to the writer of this post for this incredible material

There is a lot to be gained by working overseas

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1651136016;}i:2;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:68:"SpaceX launches another crew to the space station during record year";s:4:"link";s:98:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/spacex-launches-another-crew-to-the-space-station-during-record-year/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:52:49 +0000";s:8:"category";s:41:"SpacecrewlaunchesrecordspaceSpaceXStation";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41839";s:11:"description";s:670:"Placeholder while article actions load SpaceX sent another crew of astronauts to the International Space Station early Wednesday, its 16th launch since the beginning of the year as the company shoots rockets into orbit at a cadence unequaled in the history of U.S. space exploration. Wednesday’s launch carried three American astronauts and one from Italy. ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:10047:"
Placeholder while article actions load

SpaceX sent another crew of astronauts to the International Space Station early Wednesday, its 16th launch since the beginning of the year as the company shoots rockets into orbit at a cadence unequaled in the history of U.S. space exploration.

Wednesday’s launch carried three American astronauts and one from Italy. The crew blasted off on a Falcon 9 rocket from the Kennedy Space Center at 3:52 a.m. Eastern time for what is to be a six-month stay on the orbiting laboratory. And it came less than two days after the conclusion of the first mission to the station made up entirely of private citizens.

The majority of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 launches this year have carried the company’s Starlink satellites, which are used to beam the Internet to stations on the ground. SpaceX has been working feverishly to put up its satellite constellation, which stands at more than 2,000.

But taken together with its launches of people to the space station and the delivery of cargo there, SpaceX’s performance underscores the promise of commercial space flight and the success of CEO Elon Musk’s once radical idea of reusing boosters that have flown before to cut the expense of space ventures.

“We are really in a golden era of space exploration,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said during a preflight news conference. He noted how Cape Canaveral and the Florida Space Coast, which were moribund after the space shuttle retired in 2011, have come back to life, as a number of companies develop new rockets and spacecraft.

“Think how the Cape has transformed,” he said. “Think about all of those abandoned launchpads out there on the Cape and how they are roaring back to life.”

The booster that blasted off Wednesday was making its fourth flight, the first time astronauts were carried to space on a rocket that had flown that often. The flight, known as Crew-4, is SpaceX’s fourth operational mission under NASA’s Commercial Crew program. The three NASA astronauts on the spacecraft, dubbed “Freedom,” were Kjell Lindgren, the mission commander, and Robert Hines and Jessica Watkins, who are making their first trips to space. Samantha Cristoforetti, an Italian astronaut with the European Space Agency, joined them. Watkins would become the first Black woman to live for an extended time in space.

The crew is expected to dock with the station at 8:15 p.m. Eastern time Wednesday.

A few minutes before liftoff, Lindgren told mission control, “Let Falcon roar and freedom ring.” Once in orbit, he said that the crew was “feeling great and looking forward to the view.”

Instead of discarding its rockets after flight, as had been the practice in space exploration for decades, SpaceX flies the first stage back to a ship at sea or to a landing pad on land so that it can be refurbished and reused. On Wednesday, the booster made a successful landing on the ship, marking SpaceX’s 116th booster landing.

So far, the company has flown two boosters as many as 12 times. While officials at NASA and the Pentagon had once been skeptical about the reliability and performance of boosters that had endured the harshness of space flight, that mind-set has changed dramatically in recent years.

This month, Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA’s associate administrator for the science mission directorate, wrote on Twitter that while he was “always excited about utilizing flown @SpaceX boosters on principle and also the mission cost, I have changed my opinion about them slightly: I now PREFER previously used boosters over totally new ones for most science applications. #FlyAndLearn.”

The National Reconnaissance Office, an intelligence agency, also allowed SpaceX for the first time to use a previously flown booster for a mission this year.

In the first quarter of this year, SpaceX launched 502 spacecraft, far more than any other provider and far outpacing the Chinese space agency, which launched 38 during that time, according to BryceTech, a consulting firm. It has launched more than 250,000 pounds of mass to orbit, according to the firm, far more than even Russia, which has launched about 42,000 pounds.

The rest of the year promises to be just as busy. Musk, SpaceX’s founder, has said the company is aiming for 60 launches this year. While the company may not meet that milestone, it has some major missions planned, including another crew launch for NASA in September. Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur, is also hoping to fly another private mission to orbit by the end of the year.

Last year, he and a crew of three other civilians spent three days in orbit in SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft in a mission dubbed Inspiration4.

We would like to say thanks to the writer of this post for this outstanding material

SpaceX launches another crew to the space station during record year

";}s:7:"summary";s:670:"Placeholder while article actions load SpaceX sent another crew of astronauts to the International Space Station early Wednesday, its 16th launch since the beginning of the year as the company shoots rockets into orbit at a cadence unequaled in the history of U.S. space exploration. Wednesday’s launch carried three American astronauts and one from Italy. ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:10047:"
Placeholder while article actions load

SpaceX sent another crew of astronauts to the International Space Station early Wednesday, its 16th launch since the beginning of the year as the company shoots rockets into orbit at a cadence unequaled in the history of U.S. space exploration.

Wednesday’s launch carried three American astronauts and one from Italy. The crew blasted off on a Falcon 9 rocket from the Kennedy Space Center at 3:52 a.m. Eastern time for what is to be a six-month stay on the orbiting laboratory. And it came less than two days after the conclusion of the first mission to the station made up entirely of private citizens.

The majority of SpaceX’s Falcon 9 launches this year have carried the company’s Starlink satellites, which are used to beam the Internet to stations on the ground. SpaceX has been working feverishly to put up its satellite constellation, which stands at more than 2,000.

But taken together with its launches of people to the space station and the delivery of cargo there, SpaceX’s performance underscores the promise of commercial space flight and the success of CEO Elon Musk’s once radical idea of reusing boosters that have flown before to cut the expense of space ventures.

“We are really in a golden era of space exploration,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said during a preflight news conference. He noted how Cape Canaveral and the Florida Space Coast, which were moribund after the space shuttle retired in 2011, have come back to life, as a number of companies develop new rockets and spacecraft.

“Think how the Cape has transformed,” he said. “Think about all of those abandoned launchpads out there on the Cape and how they are roaring back to life.”

The booster that blasted off Wednesday was making its fourth flight, the first time astronauts were carried to space on a rocket that had flown that often. The flight, known as Crew-4, is SpaceX’s fourth operational mission under NASA’s Commercial Crew program. The three NASA astronauts on the spacecraft, dubbed “Freedom,” were Kjell Lindgren, the mission commander, and Robert Hines and Jessica Watkins, who are making their first trips to space. Samantha Cristoforetti, an Italian astronaut with the European Space Agency, joined them. Watkins would become the first Black woman to live for an extended time in space.

The crew is expected to dock with the station at 8:15 p.m. Eastern time Wednesday.

A few minutes before liftoff, Lindgren told mission control, “Let Falcon roar and freedom ring.” Once in orbit, he said that the crew was “feeling great and looking forward to the view.”

Instead of discarding its rockets after flight, as had been the practice in space exploration for decades, SpaceX flies the first stage back to a ship at sea or to a landing pad on land so that it can be refurbished and reused. On Wednesday, the booster made a successful landing on the ship, marking SpaceX’s 116th booster landing.

So far, the company has flown two boosters as many as 12 times. While officials at NASA and the Pentagon had once been skeptical about the reliability and performance of boosters that had endured the harshness of space flight, that mind-set has changed dramatically in recent years.

This month, Thomas Zurbuchen, NASA’s associate administrator for the science mission directorate, wrote on Twitter that while he was “always excited about utilizing flown @SpaceX boosters on principle and also the mission cost, I have changed my opinion about them slightly: I now PREFER previously used boosters over totally new ones for most science applications. #FlyAndLearn.”

The National Reconnaissance Office, an intelligence agency, also allowed SpaceX for the first time to use a previously flown booster for a mission this year.

In the first quarter of this year, SpaceX launched 502 spacecraft, far more than any other provider and far outpacing the Chinese space agency, which launched 38 during that time, according to BryceTech, a consulting firm. It has launched more than 250,000 pounds of mass to orbit, according to the firm, far more than even Russia, which has launched about 42,000 pounds.

The rest of the year promises to be just as busy. Musk, SpaceX’s founder, has said the company is aiming for 60 launches this year. While the company may not meet that milestone, it has some major missions planned, including another crew launch for NASA in September. Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur, is also hoping to fly another private mission to orbit by the end of the year.

Last year, he and a crew of three other civilians spent three days in orbit in SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft in a mission dubbed Inspiration4.

We would like to say thanks to the writer of this post for this outstanding material

SpaceX launches another crew to the space station during record year

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1651092769;}i:3;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:67:"SpaceX set to launch space station’s next astronaut crew for NASA";s:4:"link";s:94:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/spacex-set-to-launch-space-stations-next-astronaut-crew-for-nasa/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:51:34 +0000";s:8:"category";s:50:"SpaceastronautcrewlaunchNASAsetspaceSpaceXstations";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41711";s:11:"description";s:688:"CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., April 26 (Reuters) – Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX was due to launch the next long-duration astronaut crew to the International Space Station (ISS) for NASA early on Wednesday, including a medical doctor turned spacewalker and a geologist specializing in Martian landslides. The SpaceX launch vehicle, consisting of a two-stage Falcon 9 ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:10359:"

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., April 26 (Reuters) – Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX was due to launch the next long-duration astronaut crew to the International Space Station (ISS) for NASA early on Wednesday, including a medical doctor turned spacewalker and a geologist specializing in Martian landslides.

The SpaceX launch vehicle, consisting of a two-stage Falcon 9 rocket topped with a Crew Dragon capsule dubbed Freedom, was set for liftoff with its four-member crew at 3:52 a.m. EDT (0752 GMT) from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida.

If all goes according to plan, the three U.S. astronauts and their European Space Agency (ESA) crewmate from Italy will reach the space station about 17 hours later to begin a six-month science mission orbiting some 250 miles (420 km) above Earth.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

During a pre-launch briefing on Tuesday, NASA officials said forecasts called for a 90% chance of favorable weather conditions for an on-time lift-off.

“Flying safely with crew means that you’ve got to do it one step at a time,” Kathryn Lueders, associate NASA administrator for space operations, told reporters. “We’re hoping that you’ll get to see a really, really beautiful step, and we’ll get our crew safely to orbit.”

The latest mission, designated Crew 4, would mark the fourth full-fledged ISS crew NASA has sent to orbit aboard a SpaceX vehicle since the private rocket venture founded by Musk, also owner of electric carmaker Tesla Inc (TSLA.O), began flying U.S. space agency astronauts in 2020. In all, SpaceX has launched six previous human spaceflights over the past two years.

Assigned as Crew 4 commander is Dr. Kjell Lindgren, 49, a board-certified emergency medicine physician and one-time flight surgeon making his second trip to the ISS, where he logged 141 days in orbit in 2015.

During that expedition, he performed two spacewalks and participated in more than 100 science projects, including the “Veggie” lettuce experiment that marked the first time a U.S. crew member ate a crop grown in orbit.

The designated pilot for mission is rookie astronaut Bob Hines, 47, a U.S Air Force fighter pilot, test pilot and aviation instructor who has accumulated more than 3,500 hours of flight time in 50 types of aircraft and has flown 76 combat missions.

Another crew member making her debut spaceflight as mission specialist is Jessica Watkins, 33, a geologist who earned her doctorate studying the processes behind large landslides on Mars and Earth and went on to join the science team for the Mars rover Curiosity at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The Crew 4 flight will make Watkins the first African American woman to join a long-duration mission aboard the International Space Station. She follows in the footsteps of only seven other Black astronauts to have boarded ISS since its inception more than two decades ago.

Rounding out Crew 4 is Samantha Cristoforetti, 45, an ESA astronaut and Italian Air Force jet pilot making her second flight to the space station and slated to assume command of ISS operations during the team’s six-month stint, becoming Europe’s first woman placed in that role.

Cristoforetti and Watkins previously served together as aquanauts in the Aquarius underwater habitat of the NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations (NEEMO) mission in 2019.

The Crew 4 team will be welcomed aboard by seven existing ISS occupants, the four Crew 3 members they will be replacing – three American astronauts and a German ESA crewmate due to end their mission in early May – and three Russian cosmonauts.

The launch comes less than two days after a separate four-man team organized by Houston-based company Axiom Space returned from a two-week mission as the ISS’s first all-private astronaut crew, splashing down on Monday in a different SpaceX capsule. read more

It also follows a flurry of recent astro-tourism flights. Last July, two commercial space operators, Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic Holding Inc, launched back-to-back suborbital flights with their respective billionaire founders, Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson, riding along.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by Joe Skipper in Cape Canaveral, Fla., Writing and additional reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by Sandra Maler

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

We would love to give thanks to the writer of this short article for this remarkable content

SpaceX set to launch space station’s next astronaut crew for NASA

";}s:7:"summary";s:688:"CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., April 26 (Reuters) – Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX was due to launch the next long-duration astronaut crew to the International Space Station (ISS) for NASA early on Wednesday, including a medical doctor turned spacewalker and a geologist specializing in Martian landslides. The SpaceX launch vehicle, consisting of a two-stage Falcon 9 ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:10359:"

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., April 26 (Reuters) – Elon Musk’s rocket company SpaceX was due to launch the next long-duration astronaut crew to the International Space Station (ISS) for NASA early on Wednesday, including a medical doctor turned spacewalker and a geologist specializing in Martian landslides.

The SpaceX launch vehicle, consisting of a two-stage Falcon 9 rocket topped with a Crew Dragon capsule dubbed Freedom, was set for liftoff with its four-member crew at 3:52 a.m. EDT (0752 GMT) from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida.

If all goes according to plan, the three U.S. astronauts and their European Space Agency (ESA) crewmate from Italy will reach the space station about 17 hours later to begin a six-month science mission orbiting some 250 miles (420 km) above Earth.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

During a pre-launch briefing on Tuesday, NASA officials said forecasts called for a 90% chance of favorable weather conditions for an on-time lift-off.

“Flying safely with crew means that you’ve got to do it one step at a time,” Kathryn Lueders, associate NASA administrator for space operations, told reporters. “We’re hoping that you’ll get to see a really, really beautiful step, and we’ll get our crew safely to orbit.”

The latest mission, designated Crew 4, would mark the fourth full-fledged ISS crew NASA has sent to orbit aboard a SpaceX vehicle since the private rocket venture founded by Musk, also owner of electric carmaker Tesla Inc (TSLA.O), began flying U.S. space agency astronauts in 2020. In all, SpaceX has launched six previous human spaceflights over the past two years.

Assigned as Crew 4 commander is Dr. Kjell Lindgren, 49, a board-certified emergency medicine physician and one-time flight surgeon making his second trip to the ISS, where he logged 141 days in orbit in 2015.

During that expedition, he performed two spacewalks and participated in more than 100 science projects, including the “Veggie” lettuce experiment that marked the first time a U.S. crew member ate a crop grown in orbit.

The designated pilot for mission is rookie astronaut Bob Hines, 47, a U.S Air Force fighter pilot, test pilot and aviation instructor who has accumulated more than 3,500 hours of flight time in 50 types of aircraft and has flown 76 combat missions.

Another crew member making her debut spaceflight as mission specialist is Jessica Watkins, 33, a geologist who earned her doctorate studying the processes behind large landslides on Mars and Earth and went on to join the science team for the Mars rover Curiosity at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The Crew 4 flight will make Watkins the first African American woman to join a long-duration mission aboard the International Space Station. She follows in the footsteps of only seven other Black astronauts to have boarded ISS since its inception more than two decades ago.

Rounding out Crew 4 is Samantha Cristoforetti, 45, an ESA astronaut and Italian Air Force jet pilot making her second flight to the space station and slated to assume command of ISS operations during the team’s six-month stint, becoming Europe’s first woman placed in that role.

Cristoforetti and Watkins previously served together as aquanauts in the Aquarius underwater habitat of the NASA Extreme Environment Mission Operations (NEEMO) mission in 2019.

The Crew 4 team will be welcomed aboard by seven existing ISS occupants, the four Crew 3 members they will be replacing – three American astronauts and a German ESA crewmate due to end their mission in early May – and three Russian cosmonauts.

The launch comes less than two days after a separate four-man team organized by Houston-based company Axiom Space returned from a two-week mission as the ISS’s first all-private astronaut crew, splashing down on Monday in a different SpaceX capsule. read more

It also follows a flurry of recent astro-tourism flights. Last July, two commercial space operators, Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic Holding Inc, launched back-to-back suborbital flights with their respective billionaire founders, Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson, riding along.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by Joe Skipper in Cape Canaveral, Fla., Writing and additional reporting by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles; Editing by Sandra Maler

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

We would love to give thanks to the writer of this short article for this remarkable content

SpaceX set to launch space station’s next astronaut crew for NASA

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1651049494;}i:4;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:84:"Blue Origin: Ins All mit der Weltraumfirma von Jeff Bezos – für 300.000 US-Dollar";s:4:"link";s:108:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/blue-origin-ins-all-mit-der-weltraumfirma-von-jeff-bezos-fur-300-000-us-dollar/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:50:44 +0000";s:8:"category";s:61:"SpaceBezosBluederfürInsJeffmitOriginUSDollarvonWeltraumfirma";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41579";s:11:"description";s:718:"Düsseldorf Für Jeff Bezos sind sie der Anfang einer neuen Ära: Touristenflüge ins All. Mit seiner Raketenfirma Blue Origin will der Amazon-Gründer diese neue Ära im kommenden Jahr einleiten. Denn das Unternehmen mit Sitz in der Nähe von Seattle plant, schon bald testweise die ersten Menschen ins All zu schießen. Um diesen Wendepunkt mitzuerleben, müssen ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:4872:"

Düsseldorf Für Jeff Bezos sind sie der Anfang einer neuen Ära: Touristenflüge ins All. Mit seiner Raketenfirma Blue Origin will der Amazon-Gründer diese neue Ära im kommenden Jahr einleiten. Denn das Unternehmen mit Sitz in der Nähe von Seattle plant, schon bald testweise die ersten Menschen ins All zu schießen.

Um diesen Wendepunkt mitzuerleben, müssen die künftigen Weltraumtouristen allerdings tief ins Portemonnaie greifen. Die Flugtickets für das Raumflugzeug „New Shepard“ werden aller Voraussicht nach zwischen 200.000 und 300.000 US-Dollar kosten, wie die Nachrichtenagentur Reuters unter Berufung auf Insider berichtet.

Bisher hat Blue Origin acht Testflüge in Texas absolviert – allerdings ohne Passagiere an Bord. Wenn alles nach Plan läuft, könnte Blue Origin aber schon Anfang nächsten Jahres mit dem Verkauf der Tickets beginnen. Eine Anfrage von Reuters zur Preisstrategie kommentierte Bezos’ Raketenfirma nicht. Im Mai hatte der Milliardär gesagt, dass die Ticketpreise noch nicht festgelegt worden seien.

Das Raumflugzeug „New Shepard“ besteht aus einer Trägerrakete und einer abnehmbaren Passagierkapsel. Sechs Touristen kann die Firma damit ins All schießen. Bis zu elf Minuten soll die Reise in der vollautomatisierten Rakete dauern, die mit übergroßen Fenstern und Ledersitzen ausgestattet ist. Mit einem Fallschirm kehrt die Kapsel zur Erde zurück.

Top-Jobs des Tages

Jetzt die besten Jobs finden und
per E-Mail benachrichtigt werden.

Mit seiner Raketenfirma will Bezos die zivile Raumfahrt neben Sattelitendiensten und staatlichen Explorationsprojekten zu einer wichtigen Nische in der globalen Weltraumwirtschaft machen, die mittlerweile mehr als 300 Milliarden US-Dollar pro Jahr umsetzt.

Doch die Konkurrenz ist stark: Neben Bezos, dem reichsten Menschen der Welt mit einem Vermögen von 122 Milliarden US-Dollar, hoffen auch beispielsweise der Milliardär Richard Branson und Tesla-Chef Elon Musk Vorreiter in der zivilen Raumfahrt zu werden.

Im April testete Bransons Firma Virgin Galactic erstmals erfolgreich ihr Raumflugzeug „Unity“, nachdem vier Jahre zuvor der Absturz des Raumflugzeuges „SpaceShip Two“ ein Todesopfer gefordert hatte. Schon bald werden offenbar die ersten Weltraumtouristen mit „Unity“ ins All reisen: Die Firma hat bereits 650 Tickets je 250.000 US-Dollar verkauft, allerdings noch keinen konkreten Start-Zeitpunkt bekanntgegeben.

Und auch der Milliardär Musk will die Menschheit mit seiner Firma Space X in den Weltraum befördern. Anfang des Jahres schoss der Unternehmer testweise die Trägerrakete „Falcon Heavy“ ins All, weitere Starts sind für Ende des Jahres geplant. Musks ultimatives Ziel: Menschen sollen auf anderen Planeten, beispielsweise auf dem Mars, leben können.

Vor Probleme stellen die drei Unternehmer derzeit aber noch die Kosten: Eine Rakete können sie nur einmal einsetzen, sie ist aber teuer in der Produktion. Blue Origin hält die Kosten zwar geheim. Marco Caceres, Luftfahrt-Analyst bei der Teal Group, schätzt jedoch, dass jeder Flug das Raketenunternehmen etwa zehn Millionen US-Dollar kosten dürfte. Selbst wenn die sechs Passagiere von Blue Origin pro Ticket 300.000 US-Dollar zahlen sollten, würde sich die zivile Raumfahrt zunächst als Verlustgeschäft erweisen.

Aus diesem Grund versuchen die drei Raumfahrtunternehmer Raketen zu entwickeln, die sie mehrfach ins All schießen können. Dadurch würden nicht nur die Kosten für Bezos, Branson und Musk sinken. Auch die Ticketpreise würden drastisch fallen – und wer weiß: Vielleicht würde das eine neue Ära in der Mobilitätsgeschichte bedeuten.

Mit Material von Reuters.

We would like to thank the writer of this post for this incredible content

Blue Origin: Ins All mit der Weltraumfirma von Jeff Bezos – für 300.000 US-Dollar

";}s:7:"summary";s:718:"Düsseldorf Für Jeff Bezos sind sie der Anfang einer neuen Ära: Touristenflüge ins All. Mit seiner Raketenfirma Blue Origin will der Amazon-Gründer diese neue Ära im kommenden Jahr einleiten. Denn das Unternehmen mit Sitz in der Nähe von Seattle plant, schon bald testweise die ersten Menschen ins All zu schießen. Um diesen Wendepunkt mitzuerleben, müssen ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:4872:"

Düsseldorf Für Jeff Bezos sind sie der Anfang einer neuen Ära: Touristenflüge ins All. Mit seiner Raketenfirma Blue Origin will der Amazon-Gründer diese neue Ära im kommenden Jahr einleiten. Denn das Unternehmen mit Sitz in der Nähe von Seattle plant, schon bald testweise die ersten Menschen ins All zu schießen.

Um diesen Wendepunkt mitzuerleben, müssen die künftigen Weltraumtouristen allerdings tief ins Portemonnaie greifen. Die Flugtickets für das Raumflugzeug „New Shepard“ werden aller Voraussicht nach zwischen 200.000 und 300.000 US-Dollar kosten, wie die Nachrichtenagentur Reuters unter Berufung auf Insider berichtet.

Bisher hat Blue Origin acht Testflüge in Texas absolviert – allerdings ohne Passagiere an Bord. Wenn alles nach Plan läuft, könnte Blue Origin aber schon Anfang nächsten Jahres mit dem Verkauf der Tickets beginnen. Eine Anfrage von Reuters zur Preisstrategie kommentierte Bezos’ Raketenfirma nicht. Im Mai hatte der Milliardär gesagt, dass die Ticketpreise noch nicht festgelegt worden seien.

Das Raumflugzeug „New Shepard“ besteht aus einer Trägerrakete und einer abnehmbaren Passagierkapsel. Sechs Touristen kann die Firma damit ins All schießen. Bis zu elf Minuten soll die Reise in der vollautomatisierten Rakete dauern, die mit übergroßen Fenstern und Ledersitzen ausgestattet ist. Mit einem Fallschirm kehrt die Kapsel zur Erde zurück.

Top-Jobs des Tages

Jetzt die besten Jobs finden und
per E-Mail benachrichtigt werden.

Mit seiner Raketenfirma will Bezos die zivile Raumfahrt neben Sattelitendiensten und staatlichen Explorationsprojekten zu einer wichtigen Nische in der globalen Weltraumwirtschaft machen, die mittlerweile mehr als 300 Milliarden US-Dollar pro Jahr umsetzt.

Doch die Konkurrenz ist stark: Neben Bezos, dem reichsten Menschen der Welt mit einem Vermögen von 122 Milliarden US-Dollar, hoffen auch beispielsweise der Milliardär Richard Branson und Tesla-Chef Elon Musk Vorreiter in der zivilen Raumfahrt zu werden.

Im April testete Bransons Firma Virgin Galactic erstmals erfolgreich ihr Raumflugzeug „Unity“, nachdem vier Jahre zuvor der Absturz des Raumflugzeuges „SpaceShip Two“ ein Todesopfer gefordert hatte. Schon bald werden offenbar die ersten Weltraumtouristen mit „Unity“ ins All reisen: Die Firma hat bereits 650 Tickets je 250.000 US-Dollar verkauft, allerdings noch keinen konkreten Start-Zeitpunkt bekanntgegeben.

Und auch der Milliardär Musk will die Menschheit mit seiner Firma Space X in den Weltraum befördern. Anfang des Jahres schoss der Unternehmer testweise die Trägerrakete „Falcon Heavy“ ins All, weitere Starts sind für Ende des Jahres geplant. Musks ultimatives Ziel: Menschen sollen auf anderen Planeten, beispielsweise auf dem Mars, leben können.

Vor Probleme stellen die drei Unternehmer derzeit aber noch die Kosten: Eine Rakete können sie nur einmal einsetzen, sie ist aber teuer in der Produktion. Blue Origin hält die Kosten zwar geheim. Marco Caceres, Luftfahrt-Analyst bei der Teal Group, schätzt jedoch, dass jeder Flug das Raketenunternehmen etwa zehn Millionen US-Dollar kosten dürfte. Selbst wenn die sechs Passagiere von Blue Origin pro Ticket 300.000 US-Dollar zahlen sollten, würde sich die zivile Raumfahrt zunächst als Verlustgeschäft erweisen.

Aus diesem Grund versuchen die drei Raumfahrtunternehmer Raketen zu entwickeln, die sie mehrfach ins All schießen können. Dadurch würden nicht nur die Kosten für Bezos, Branson und Musk sinken. Auch die Ticketpreise würden drastisch fallen – und wer weiß: Vielleicht würde das eine neue Ära in der Mobilitätsgeschichte bedeuten.

Mit Material von Reuters.

We would like to thank the writer of this post for this incredible content

Blue Origin: Ins All mit der Weltraumfirma von Jeff Bezos – für 300.000 US-Dollar

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1651006244;}i:5;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:70:"Ex-SpaceX-Manager: Hans Königsmann wird Aufsichtsrat von OHB – WELT";s:4:"link";s:94:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/ex-spacex-manager-hans-konigsmann-wird-aufsichtsrat-von-ohb-welt/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:49:31 +0000";s:8:"category";s:61:"SpaceAufsichtsratExSpaceXManagerHansKönigsmannOHBvonWeltwird";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41458";s:11:"description";s:778:"Wirtschaft OHB Ex-Manager von Elon Musks SpaceX wechselt zu Bremer Raumfahrtkonzern Stand: 23.04.2022 | Lesedauer: 2 Minuten Hans Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Raumfahrt-Branche Quelle: picture alliance/Courtesy Everett Collection/© Netflix Hier können Sie unsere WELT-Podcasts hören Um eingebettete Inhalte anzuzeigen, ist deine widerrufliche Einwilligung in die Übermittlung und Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten notwendig, da ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:18422:"
Wirtschaft OHB

Ex-Manager von Elon Musks SpaceX wechselt zu Bremer Raumfahrtkonzern

Hans Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Raumfahrt-Branche

Hans Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Raumfahrt-Branche

Quelle: picture alliance/Courtesy Everett Collection/© Netflix

Hier können Sie unsere WELT-Podcasts hören

Um eingebettete Inhalte anzuzeigen, ist deine widerrufliche Einwilligung in die Übermittlung und Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten notwendig, da die Anbieter der eingebetteten Inhalte als Drittanbieter diese Einwilligung verlangen [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. Indem du den Schalter auf „an“ stellst, stimmst du diesen (jederzeit widerruflich) zu. Dies umfasst auch deine Einwilligung in die Übermittlung bestimmter personenbezogener Daten in Drittländer, u.a. die USA, nach Art. 49 (1) (a) DSGVO. Mehr Informationen dazu findest du . Du kannst deine Einwilligung jederzeit über den Schalter und über Privatsphäre am Seitenende widerrufen.

Hans Königsmann war einer der wichtigsten Manager von Elon Musks Raumfahrtunternehmen Space X. Jetzt zieht er in das Kontrollgremium des Bremer Raumfahrtkonzerns OHB ein. Es ist nicht sein erstes Engagement in Deutschland.

Diesem Deutschen hat Tesla-Chef und SpaceX-Gründer Elon Musk bei seinen Raumfahrtplänen viel zu verdanken: Der Ingenieur Hans Königsmann war technischer Mitarbeiter Nummer vier, als Musk vor 20 Jahren sein Raumfahrtunternehmen SpaceX gründete. Heute gilt der US-Konzern als Taktgeber der Branche. Und Königsmann stieg dort bis zum Vizepräsidenten und Chefingenieur auf.

Der 1963 geborene, promovierte Ingenieur zog sich Anfang 2021 bei SpaceX zurück und strebt jetzt eine neue Aufgabe an. Nach WELT AM SONNTAG-Informationen soll Königsmann in den Aufsichtsrat des großen deutschen Raumfahrtkonzerns OHB in Bremen aufrücken.

Das Kontrollgremium soll dazu eigens auf fünf Personen erweitert werden. Die Hauptversammlung am 1. Juni muss die Wahl Königsmanns absegnen, was als Formsache gilt.

Lesen Sie auch

Die russische Sojus-FG Trägerrakete mit dem Raumschiff Sojus MS-15

OHB verweist auf die „herausragende Expertise“ des Ingenieurs, der den Aufbau von SpaceX gemeinsam mit Musk von den kleinsten Anfängen begleitete. Er war bei den ersten Fehlschlägen mit der Rakete Falcon 1 bis zu den Erfolgen mit den Modellen Falcon 9, der Dragon-Kapsel für Fracht und Personentransporte oder dem Satellitennetz Starlink dabei.

Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Branche, selbst wenn er hin und wieder über Fehlschläge berichten musste. 2014 wurde er von der US-Bundesbehörde Nasa für seine Verdienste ausgezeichnet. Er verteidigte die Philosophie von Musk, über radikal neue Ideen, wie wiederverwendbare Raketenstufen, und den Mut zum Risiko letztlich Innovationen zu erreichen.

Zwischen dem ehemaligen SpaceX-Manager und OHB gibt es langjährige Beziehungen. Im Rahmen seiner Promotion arbeitete er einst an der Universität Bremen am Kleinsatelliten „Bremsat“, der in enger Zusammenarbeit mit dem deutschen Raumfahrtkonzern entwickelt wurde. Wie es heißt, gab es immer wieder Kontakt zwischen der Familie Fuchs als OHB-Großaktionär sowie dem später in Kalifornien lebenden Königsmann.

Lesen Sie auch

NASA Orion SpacecraftFolgen Orion spacecraft NASA Orion SpacecraftFolgen Orion reentry The Orion spacecraft will reenter Earth's atmosphere traveling about 25,000 mph during Exploration Mission-1. It's heat shield will endure temperatures approaching 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Wie SpaceX verfolgt auch OHB mit 917 Millionen Euro Umsatz 2021 eine breitere Aufstellung, von Satelliten für diverse Missionen samt Dienstleistungen bis hin zum Bau von zunächst kleinen Raketen mit dem Unternehmen Rocket Factory Augsburg.

Für Königsmann wäre OHB nicht das erste Engagement in Deutschland. Seit Oktober 2021 gehört er auch dem Aufsichtsrat von Mynaric an, einem börsennotierten Start-up für Datentransfertechnik im Weltraum und zur Erde per Laserstrahlen. An der Spitze von Mynaric steht seit Mitte 2020 Bulent Altan, ein anderer langjähriger ehemaliger SpaceX-Mitarbeiter.

Lesen Sie auch

Vorbereitungen auf ISS-Einsatz

An dieser Stelle finden Sie Inhalte von Drittanbietern

Um eingebettete Inhalte anzuzeigen, ist deine widerrufliche Einwilligung in die Übermittlung und Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten notwendig, da die Anbieter der eingebetteten Inhalte als Drittanbieter diese Einwilligung verlangen [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. Indem du den Schalter auf „an“ stellst, stimmst du diesen (jederzeit widerruflich) zu. Dies umfasst auch deine Einwilligung in die Übermittlung bestimmter personenbezogener Daten in Drittländer, u.a. die USA, nach Art. 49 (1) (a) DSGVO. Mehr Informationen dazu findest du . Du kannst deine Einwilligung jederzeit über den Schalter und über Privatsphäre am Seitenende widerrufen.

We want to give thanks to the writer of this post for this remarkable web content

Ex-SpaceX-Manager: Hans Königsmann wird Aufsichtsrat von OHB – WELT

";}s:7:"summary";s:778:"Wirtschaft OHB Ex-Manager von Elon Musks SpaceX wechselt zu Bremer Raumfahrtkonzern Stand: 23.04.2022 | Lesedauer: 2 Minuten Hans Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Raumfahrt-Branche Quelle: picture alliance/Courtesy Everett Collection/© Netflix Hier können Sie unsere WELT-Podcasts hören Um eingebettete Inhalte anzuzeigen, ist deine widerrufliche Einwilligung in die Übermittlung und Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten notwendig, da ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:18422:"
Wirtschaft OHB

Ex-Manager von Elon Musks SpaceX wechselt zu Bremer Raumfahrtkonzern

Hans Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Raumfahrt-Branche

Hans Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Raumfahrt-Branche

Quelle: picture alliance/Courtesy Everett Collection/© Netflix

Hier können Sie unsere WELT-Podcasts hören

Um eingebettete Inhalte anzuzeigen, ist deine widerrufliche Einwilligung in die Übermittlung und Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten notwendig, da die Anbieter der eingebetteten Inhalte als Drittanbieter diese Einwilligung verlangen [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. Indem du den Schalter auf „an“ stellst, stimmst du diesen (jederzeit widerruflich) zu. Dies umfasst auch deine Einwilligung in die Übermittlung bestimmter personenbezogener Daten in Drittländer, u.a. die USA, nach Art. 49 (1) (a) DSGVO. Mehr Informationen dazu findest du . Du kannst deine Einwilligung jederzeit über den Schalter und über Privatsphäre am Seitenende widerrufen.

Hans Königsmann war einer der wichtigsten Manager von Elon Musks Raumfahrtunternehmen Space X. Jetzt zieht er in das Kontrollgremium des Bremer Raumfahrtkonzerns OHB ein. Es ist nicht sein erstes Engagement in Deutschland.

Diesem Deutschen hat Tesla-Chef und SpaceX-Gründer Elon Musk bei seinen Raumfahrtplänen viel zu verdanken: Der Ingenieur Hans Königsmann war technischer Mitarbeiter Nummer vier, als Musk vor 20 Jahren sein Raumfahrtunternehmen SpaceX gründete. Heute gilt der US-Konzern als Taktgeber der Branche. Und Königsmann stieg dort bis zum Vizepräsidenten und Chefingenieur auf.

Der 1963 geborene, promovierte Ingenieur zog sich Anfang 2021 bei SpaceX zurück und strebt jetzt eine neue Aufgabe an. Nach WELT AM SONNTAG-Informationen soll Königsmann in den Aufsichtsrat des großen deutschen Raumfahrtkonzerns OHB in Bremen aufrücken.

Das Kontrollgremium soll dazu eigens auf fünf Personen erweitert werden. Die Hauptversammlung am 1. Juni muss die Wahl Königsmanns absegnen, was als Formsache gilt.

Lesen Sie auch

Die russische Sojus-FG Trägerrakete mit dem Raumschiff Sojus MS-15

OHB verweist auf die „herausragende Expertise“ des Ingenieurs, der den Aufbau von SpaceX gemeinsam mit Musk von den kleinsten Anfängen begleitete. Er war bei den ersten Fehlschlägen mit der Rakete Falcon 1 bis zu den Erfolgen mit den Modellen Falcon 9, der Dragon-Kapsel für Fracht und Personentransporte oder dem Satellitennetz Starlink dabei.

Königsmann genießt großes Ansehen in der Branche, selbst wenn er hin und wieder über Fehlschläge berichten musste. 2014 wurde er von der US-Bundesbehörde Nasa für seine Verdienste ausgezeichnet. Er verteidigte die Philosophie von Musk, über radikal neue Ideen, wie wiederverwendbare Raketenstufen, und den Mut zum Risiko letztlich Innovationen zu erreichen.

Zwischen dem ehemaligen SpaceX-Manager und OHB gibt es langjährige Beziehungen. Im Rahmen seiner Promotion arbeitete er einst an der Universität Bremen am Kleinsatelliten „Bremsat“, der in enger Zusammenarbeit mit dem deutschen Raumfahrtkonzern entwickelt wurde. Wie es heißt, gab es immer wieder Kontakt zwischen der Familie Fuchs als OHB-Großaktionär sowie dem später in Kalifornien lebenden Königsmann.

Lesen Sie auch

NASA Orion SpacecraftFolgen Orion spacecraft NASA Orion SpacecraftFolgen Orion reentry The Orion spacecraft will reenter Earth's atmosphere traveling about 25,000 mph during Exploration Mission-1. It's heat shield will endure temperatures approaching 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Wie SpaceX verfolgt auch OHB mit 917 Millionen Euro Umsatz 2021 eine breitere Aufstellung, von Satelliten für diverse Missionen samt Dienstleistungen bis hin zum Bau von zunächst kleinen Raketen mit dem Unternehmen Rocket Factory Augsburg.

Für Königsmann wäre OHB nicht das erste Engagement in Deutschland. Seit Oktober 2021 gehört er auch dem Aufsichtsrat von Mynaric an, einem börsennotierten Start-up für Datentransfertechnik im Weltraum und zur Erde per Laserstrahlen. An der Spitze von Mynaric steht seit Mitte 2020 Bulent Altan, ein anderer langjähriger ehemaliger SpaceX-Mitarbeiter.

Lesen Sie auch

Vorbereitungen auf ISS-Einsatz

An dieser Stelle finden Sie Inhalte von Drittanbietern

Um eingebettete Inhalte anzuzeigen, ist deine widerrufliche Einwilligung in die Übermittlung und Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten notwendig, da die Anbieter der eingebetteten Inhalte als Drittanbieter diese Einwilligung verlangen [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. Indem du den Schalter auf „an“ stellst, stimmst du diesen (jederzeit widerruflich) zu. Dies umfasst auch deine Einwilligung in die Übermittlung bestimmter personenbezogener Daten in Drittländer, u.a. die USA, nach Art. 49 (1) (a) DSGVO. Mehr Informationen dazu findest du . Du kannst deine Einwilligung jederzeit über den Schalter und über Privatsphäre am Seitenende widerrufen.

We want to give thanks to the writer of this post for this remarkable web content

Ex-SpaceX-Manager: Hans Königsmann wird Aufsichtsrat von OHB – WELT

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1650962971;}i:6;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:85:"O LHC Do CERN É Religado Depois de 3 Anos E Promete Levar A Física Ao Seu Limite!!!";s:4:"link";s:110:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/o-lhc-do-cern-e-religado-depois-de-3-anos-e-promete-levar-a-fisica-ao-seu-limite/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:48:39 +0000";s:8:"category";s:59:"SpaceañosCERNDepoisFísicaLevarLHCLimiteprometeReligadoseu";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41330";s:11:"description";s:709:"Os cientistas que supervisionam o maior acelerador de partículas da Terra o ligaram pela primeira vez em três anos neste fim de semana, dia 22 de abril de 2022, para resolver alguns dos maiores mistérios da física. O Large Hadron Collider (LHC), o poderoso acelerador de partículas localizado no CERN perto de Genebra, na Suíça, foi religado, ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:6748:"

Os cientistas que supervisionam o maior acelerador de partículas da Terra o ligaram pela primeira vez em três anos neste fim de semana, dia 22 de abril de 2022, para resolver alguns dos maiores mistérios da física.

Large Hadron Collider (LHC), o poderoso acelerador de partículas localizado no CERN perto de Genebra, na Suíça, foi religado,  na sexta-feira (22 de abril) após um desligamento de três anos para manutenção e atualizações. A reativação deu início ao que os cientistas chamam de Run 3 , a terceira corrida científica do LHC, que realizará experimentos até 2024.

“As máquinas e instalações passaram por grandes atualizações durante o segundo longo desligamento do complexo de aceleradores do CERN”, disse Mike Lamont, diretor de aceleradores e tecnologia do CERN. “O próprio LHC passou por um extenso programa de consolidação e agora operará com uma energia ainda maior e, graças a grandes melhorias no complexo de injetores, fornecerá significativamente mais dados para os experimentos atualizados do LHC”. Esses experimentos se basearão nas descobertas do LHC durante sua Run 1 (2009-2013) e Run 2 (2015-2018).

Para sua reativação, os cientistas acionaram o anel de 27 quilômetros do LHC para injetar dois feixes de prótons em direções opostas a um nível de energia de 450 bilhões de elétron-volts. Isso é apenas um aperitivo para níveis de energia ainda mais altos que o LHC operará assim que atingir sua meta de 13,6 trilhões de elétron-volts para o Run 3, disseram os cientistas.

“Esses feixes circularam na injeção de energia e continham um número relativamente pequeno de prótons. Colisões de alta intensidade e alta energia estão a alguns meses de distância”, disse Rhodri Jones, que lidera o departamento de feixes do CERN. O que foi feito até agora representa o reinício bem-sucedido do acelerador após todo o trabalho duro e do longo período de desligamento pelo qual ele passou.

lhc religado 02

A paralisação de três anos do LHC permitiu que os cientistas fizessem atualizações substanciais em quatro experimentos importantes no acelerador de partículas. Seus detectores ATLAS e CMS sozinhos receberão mais colisões de partículas do que as duas últimas execuções combinadas, de acordo com o CERN. ATLAS (abreviação de A Toroidal LHC Apparatus) detecta os minúsculos fragmentos subatômicos de colisões de partículas e é usado para caçar o bóson de Higgs, matéria escura e dimensões extras. O CMS (abreviação de Compact Muon Solenoid) é um detector de uso geral que usa diferentes sistemas para observações semelhantes ao ATLAS.

Além do ATLAS e do CMS, o experimento ALICE do acelerador de partículas para colisões de íons pesados ​​será capaz de detectar 50 vezes mais colisões graças à sua atualização, enquanto outro instrumento, chamado LHCb, verá sua capacidade de detecção aumentar por um fator de três, de acordo com o CERN.

“O número sem precedentes de colisões permitirá que equipes internacionais de físicos do CERN e de todo o mundo estudem o bóson de Higgs em grande detalhe e coloquem o Modelo Padrão da física de partículas e suas várias extensões nos testes mais rigorosos até agora”, escreveram funcionários do CERN em uma declaração.

Dois novos experimentos serão ativados no LHC para o Run 3. Chamados de Forward Search Experiment (FASER) e de Scattering and Neutrino Detector no LHC (SND@LHC), eles devem explorar novas físicas além do Modelo Padrão, medir formas de antimatéria e explorar a física dos raios cósmicos e um estranho estado da matéria chamado plasma quark-gluon .

Levará várias semanas de trabalho de comissionamento antes que o LHC renovado esteja pronto para medições científicas reais. Essas corridas científicas devem começar no meio do ano de 2022, disseram as autoridades do CERN.

Assim que o Run 3 for concluído em 2024, os cientistas do CERN irão desligá-lo para outra revisão planejada que incluirá mais atualizações para o acelerador de partículas massivo. Uma vez concluídas, essas atualizações permitirão que os cientistas renomeiem o LHC como “High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider” assim que reabrir em 2028.

Fonte:

https://www.space.com/large-hadron-collider-restarts-run-3

We would love to say thanks to the writer of this article for this amazing material

O LHC Do CERN É Religado Depois de 3 Anos E Promete Levar A Física Ao Seu Limite!!!

";}s:7:"summary";s:709:"Os cientistas que supervisionam o maior acelerador de partículas da Terra o ligaram pela primeira vez em três anos neste fim de semana, dia 22 de abril de 2022, para resolver alguns dos maiores mistérios da física. O Large Hadron Collider (LHC), o poderoso acelerador de partículas localizado no CERN perto de Genebra, na Suíça, foi religado, ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:6748:"

Os cientistas que supervisionam o maior acelerador de partículas da Terra o ligaram pela primeira vez em três anos neste fim de semana, dia 22 de abril de 2022, para resolver alguns dos maiores mistérios da física.

Large Hadron Collider (LHC), o poderoso acelerador de partículas localizado no CERN perto de Genebra, na Suíça, foi religado,  na sexta-feira (22 de abril) após um desligamento de três anos para manutenção e atualizações. A reativação deu início ao que os cientistas chamam de Run 3 , a terceira corrida científica do LHC, que realizará experimentos até 2024.

“As máquinas e instalações passaram por grandes atualizações durante o segundo longo desligamento do complexo de aceleradores do CERN”, disse Mike Lamont, diretor de aceleradores e tecnologia do CERN. “O próprio LHC passou por um extenso programa de consolidação e agora operará com uma energia ainda maior e, graças a grandes melhorias no complexo de injetores, fornecerá significativamente mais dados para os experimentos atualizados do LHC”. Esses experimentos se basearão nas descobertas do LHC durante sua Run 1 (2009-2013) e Run 2 (2015-2018).

Para sua reativação, os cientistas acionaram o anel de 27 quilômetros do LHC para injetar dois feixes de prótons em direções opostas a um nível de energia de 450 bilhões de elétron-volts. Isso é apenas um aperitivo para níveis de energia ainda mais altos que o LHC operará assim que atingir sua meta de 13,6 trilhões de elétron-volts para o Run 3, disseram os cientistas.

“Esses feixes circularam na injeção de energia e continham um número relativamente pequeno de prótons. Colisões de alta intensidade e alta energia estão a alguns meses de distância”, disse Rhodri Jones, que lidera o departamento de feixes do CERN. O que foi feito até agora representa o reinício bem-sucedido do acelerador após todo o trabalho duro e do longo período de desligamento pelo qual ele passou.

lhc religado 02

A paralisação de três anos do LHC permitiu que os cientistas fizessem atualizações substanciais em quatro experimentos importantes no acelerador de partículas. Seus detectores ATLAS e CMS sozinhos receberão mais colisões de partículas do que as duas últimas execuções combinadas, de acordo com o CERN. ATLAS (abreviação de A Toroidal LHC Apparatus) detecta os minúsculos fragmentos subatômicos de colisões de partículas e é usado para caçar o bóson de Higgs, matéria escura e dimensões extras. O CMS (abreviação de Compact Muon Solenoid) é um detector de uso geral que usa diferentes sistemas para observações semelhantes ao ATLAS.

Além do ATLAS e do CMS, o experimento ALICE do acelerador de partículas para colisões de íons pesados ​​será capaz de detectar 50 vezes mais colisões graças à sua atualização, enquanto outro instrumento, chamado LHCb, verá sua capacidade de detecção aumentar por um fator de três, de acordo com o CERN.

“O número sem precedentes de colisões permitirá que equipes internacionais de físicos do CERN e de todo o mundo estudem o bóson de Higgs em grande detalhe e coloquem o Modelo Padrão da física de partículas e suas várias extensões nos testes mais rigorosos até agora”, escreveram funcionários do CERN em uma declaração.

Dois novos experimentos serão ativados no LHC para o Run 3. Chamados de Forward Search Experiment (FASER) e de Scattering and Neutrino Detector no LHC (SND@LHC), eles devem explorar novas físicas além do Modelo Padrão, medir formas de antimatéria e explorar a física dos raios cósmicos e um estranho estado da matéria chamado plasma quark-gluon .

Levará várias semanas de trabalho de comissionamento antes que o LHC renovado esteja pronto para medições científicas reais. Essas corridas científicas devem começar no meio do ano de 2022, disseram as autoridades do CERN.

Assim que o Run 3 for concluído em 2024, os cientistas do CERN irão desligá-lo para outra revisão planejada que incluirá mais atualizações para o acelerador de partículas massivo. Uma vez concluídas, essas atualizações permitirão que os cientistas renomeiem o LHC como “High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider” assim que reabrir em 2028.

Fonte:

https://www.space.com/large-hadron-collider-restarts-run-3

We would love to say thanks to the writer of this article for this amazing material

O LHC Do CERN É Religado Depois de 3 Anos E Promete Levar A Física Ao Seu Limite!!!

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1650919719;}i:7;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:183:"Global Aerospace & Defense Market, Utilization, Trend, Size, Application, Region, Speed, Output, Statistics, Capacity, forces, View, Consumption Forecast 2022-2029 – Digital Journal";s:4:"link";s:195:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/global-aerospace-defense-market-utilization-trend-size-application-region-speed-output-statistics-capacity-forces-view-consumption-forecast-2022-2029-digital-journal/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:47:13 +0000";s:8:"category";s:142:"SpaceAerospaceApplicationcapacityconsumptiondefensedigitalforcesforecastglobaljournalmarketOutputregionsizespeedStatisticstrendUtilizationview";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41220";s:11:"description";s:1106:"This report studies the Global Aerospace & Defense Market, covering market size for segment by Market Dynamics (Drivers, Restraints and Challenges, Opportunities, etc.), by application (Aircraft and Components Manufacturing, Space, Military, and Other Transportation, Ship Building and Repairing, Radars and Weapon, Other), by Sales Channel (Direct Channel, Distribution Channel), by player (Thales Group, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., BAE ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:31802:"

This report studies the Global Aerospace & Defense Market, covering market size for segment by Market Dynamics (Drivers, Restraints and Challenges, Opportunities, etc.), by application (Aircraft and Components Manufacturing, Space, Military, and Other Transportation, Ship Building and Repairing, Radars and Weapon, Other), by Sales Channel (Direct Channel, Distribution Channel), by player (Thales Group, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., BAE Systems PLC Raytheon Company) and by region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America and Middle East & Africa). This report also gives the information about Influence of COVID- 19 Outbreak on Global Aerospace & Defense Market Industry Development.

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market research report provides an assessment of the Global Aerospace and Defense Market, providing an outlook of the global and regional markets in a systematic way. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market study deep-dives into the market’s various dimensions. The report elucidates the following aspects-
• Implementations
• Meanings
• Supply chain management
• Market classification
• Manufacturing operations
• Development plans
• Initial capital investments.

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market latest market analysis surveys the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the following: Global consumer prices, annual growth rate, and market share. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market study also caters to the audience by providing a clearer understanding of development trends, the growth standing of major regions, and an overview of the business outlook.

Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market primary goal of this research is to provide information on the post-COVID-19 impact that will aid market participants in this field in evaluating their business strategies. In addition, Global Aerospace and Defense Market segmentation by main market players, kinds, applications/end users, and geography is included in this study (United States, Europe (Russia, Germany, UK, Poland , France, Italy, Spain) India, China, Japan, Southeast Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia), Middle East and Africa (United Arab, Egypt, Emirates, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Nigeria) and Others).

Top Players covered in Aerospace and Defense Market report:

Get a sample copy of the report @ https://proficientmarketinsights.com/enquiry/request-sample/20580415

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market research report is the outcome of inductive studies on the industry’s dynamics that are shaping the growth prevailing and future situations by evaluating the market by market share, geography, and size in terms of volume and value. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market research report provides market classifications, applications, major supply chain structures, and principles. The study also scrutinizes the various forces of the Global Aerospace and Defense Market affecting product demand, vital sub-segments, revenue for the base year and the forecast period (20222029), and significant issues faced by the market players.

Aerospace and Defense Segmentation Covers:

This report displays the price, market share, growth rate, production, revenue of Global Aerospace and Defense Market types split into:

Aerospace and Defense Application Covers:

This report focuses on the status and outlook for sales volume, growth rate, market share, Global Aerospace and Defense Market application includes:

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market highlights trends and regions where they do business. Evidence-based data on the COVID-19 pandemic on market value, sales share, and projected growth rates for each segment is also mentioned in the report. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market business report also includes the market’s construction with respect to recent trends and the adoption of technological innovations by key players. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market report aims to provide insightful data regarding the competitive environment to strategic consumers gearing to gain a competitive advantage in the Global Aerospace and Defense Market.

Global Aerospace and Defense Market report answers the following questions:
• Detailed Overview of Global Aerospace and Defense Market will help deliver clients and businesses making strategies.
• Influencing factors that thriving demand and latest trend running in the market.
• What is the market concentration? Is it fragmented or highly concentrated?
• What trends, challenges and barriers will impact the development and sizing of Global Aerospace and Defense Market?
• SWOT Analysis of each defined key players along with its profile and Porter’s five forces tool mechanism to compliment the same.
• What growth momentum or acceleration market carries during the forecast period?
• Which region may tap highest market share in coming era?
• Which application/end-user category or Product Type may seek incremental growth prospects?
• What focused approach and constraints are holding the Global Aerospace and Defense Market?

Have a query before purchasing this report @ https://proficientmarketinsights.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/20580415

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market study contains historical statistics and a general overview of revenues over the forecast period (20222029). The record focuses on various Global Aerospace and Defense Market categories to provide revenue-generating opportunities to stakeholders.

Regions Covered in Global Aerospace and Defense Market Report:
United States
Europe (UK, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Poland)
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam)
Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia)
Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria)
Other Regions

Global Aerospace and Defense Market Report Highlights:
• Volume, consumption forecast and market value forecast from 2022-2029
• To present the top Global Aerospace and Defense Market players, their company profiles, product portfolio, market share, and revenue analysis
• Top regions of Global Aerospace and Defense Market, SWOT analysis, opportunities and threats to market development are explained
• To investigate the various applications, product types, market value, and manufacturing capacity.
• Flashlight the business potential, import-export status, production, and expenditure analysis
• The mergers and properties, probability analysis, and analyst views and opinions are given
• Breakdown and planning of Global Aerospace and Defense Market based on status, value and market size
• Global Aerospace and Defense Market industry chain structure, manufacturing base, raw material cost, and marketing channel analysis is covered
• Presents strategic recommendations to the new Global Aerospace and Defense Market participants
• Company profiles, strategies, mergers and acquisitions, financial status, and feasibility analysis are described

Global Aerospace and Defense Market Summary

The report focuses on the Aerospace and Defense market size, segment size (mainly covering product type, application, and geography), competitor landscape, recent status, and development trends. Furthermore, the report provides detailed cost analysis, supply chain.

Technological innovation and advancement will further optimize the performance of the product, making it more widely used in downstream applications. Moreover, Consumer behavior analysis and market dynamics (drivers, restraints, opportunities) provides crucial information for knowing the Aerospace and Defense market.

Key players in the global Aerospace and Defense market covered in Chapter 2 and Chapter 6:
Thales Group
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
BAE Systems PLC Raytheon Company
Northrop Grumman Corporation
General Dynamics Corporation
GE Aviation
Lockheed Martin
Airbus Group
United Technologies Corp.
Boeing

In Chapter 8 and Chapter 10.3, based on types, the Aerospace and Defense market from 2017 to 2029 is primarily split into:
Aerospace
Defense

In Chapter 9 and Chapter 10.4, based on applications, the Aerospace and Defense market from 2017 to 2029 covers:
Aircraft and Components Manufacturing
Space, Military, and Other Transportation
Ship Building and Repairing
Radars and Weapon
Other

Geographically, the report includes the research on production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate, and forecast (2017 -2029) of the following regions:
United States
Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland)
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam)
Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia)
Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria)
Other Regions

Chapter 1 provides an overview of Aerospace and Defense market, containing global revenue and CAGR. The forecast and analysis of Aerospace and Defense market by type, application, and region are also presented in this chapter.

Chapter 2 is about the market landscape and major players. It provides competitive situation and market concentration status along with the basic information of these players.

Chapter 3 introduces the industrial chain of Aerospace and Defense. Industrial chain analysis, raw material (suppliers, price, supply and demand, market concentration rate) and downstream buyers are analyzed in this chapter.

Chapter 4 concentrates on manufacturing analysis, including cost structure analysis and process analysis, making up a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing cost.

Chapter 5 provides clear insights into market dynamics, the influence of COVID-19 in Aerospace and Defense industry, consumer behavior analysis.

Chapter 6 provides a full-scale analysis of major players in Aerospace and Defense industry. The basic information, as well as the profiles, applications and specifications of products market performance along with Business Overview are offered.

Chapter 7 pays attention to the sales, revenue, price and gross margin of Aerospace and Defense in markets of different regions. The analysis on sales, revenue, price and gross margin of the global market is covered in this part.

Chapter 8 gives a worldwide view of Aerospace and Defense market. It includes sales, revenue, price, market share and the growth rate by type.

Chapter 9 focuses on the application of Aerospace and Defense, by analyzing the consumption and its growth rate of each application.

Chapter 10 prospects the whole Aerospace and Defense market, including the global sales and revenue forecast, regional forecast. It also foresees the Aerospace and Defense market by type and application.

Years considered for this report:
Historical Years: 2017-2021
Base Year: 2021
Estimated Year: 2022
Forecast Period: 2022-2029

Key Points Profiled in the Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industry Report:

The report offers readers an analysis of the industry landscape, enabling them to assess the Global Aerospace and Defense Market head-to-head competition, sales, promotional and marketing experience, price strategy, product range and distribution overview.

Major Points from TOC:
1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Global Aerospace and Defense Market
1.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Sales and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (2017-2029)
1.2.2 The Market Profile of Home Theatre in-a-box (HTiB)
1.2.3 The Market Profile of Home Audio Speakers and Systems
1.2.4 The Market Profile of Others
1.3 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2017-2029)
1.3.2 The Market Profile of Use for TVs
1.3.3 The Market Profile of Use for Computers
1.3.4 The Market Profile of Others
1.4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market, Region Wise (2017-2022)
1.4.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Size (Revenue) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2017-2022)
1.4.2 United States Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3 Europe Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.1 Germany Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.2 UK Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.3 France Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.4 Italy Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.5 Spain Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.6 Russia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.7 Poland Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.4 China Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.5 Japan Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.6 India Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7 Southeast Asia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.1 Malaysia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.2 Singapore Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.3 Philippines Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.4 Indonesia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.5 Thailand Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.6 Vietnam Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8 Latin America Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.1 Brazil Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.2 Mexico Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.3 Colombia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9 Middle East and Africa Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.1 Saudi Arabia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.2 United Arab Emirates Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.3 Turkey Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.4 Egypt Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.5 South Africa Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.6 Nigeria Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.5 Global Market Size of Global Aerospace and Defense Market (2017-2029)
1.5.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Revenue Status and Outlook (2017-2029)
1.5.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Sales Status and Outlook (2017-2029)

2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Landscape by Player
2.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.3 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Average Price by Player (2017-2022)
2.4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)
2.5 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type by Player
2.6 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Share of Top 3 and Top 6 Players
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Upstream and Downstream Analysis
3.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industrial Chain Analysis
3.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis
3.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis
3.4 Manufacturing Process Analysis
3.5 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
3.6 Downstream Buyers
3.7 Value Chain Status under COVID-18

4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Manufacturing Cost Analysis
4.1 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
4.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Key Raw Materials Cost Analysis
4.2.1 Key Raw Materials Introduction
4.2.2 Price Trend of Key Raw Materials
4.3 Labor Cost Analysis
4.3.1 Labor Cost of Global Aerospace and Defense Market under COVID-19
4.4 Energy Costs Analysis
4.5 RandD Costs Analysis

5 Market Dynamics
5.1 Drivers
5.2 Restraints and Challenges
5.3 Opportunities
5.3.1 Advances in Innovation and Technology for Global Aerospace and Defense Market
5.3.2 Increased Demand in Emerging Markets
5.4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak
5.4.1 Global COVID-19 Status Overview
5.4.2 Influence of COVID-19 Outbreak on Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industry Development
5.5 Consumer Behavior Analysis

6 Players Profiles
6.1 Sony
6.1.1 Sony Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.1.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.1.3 Sony Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.1.4 Sony Business Overview
6.2 VIZIO
6.2.1 VIZIO Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.2.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.2.3 VIZIO Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.2.4 VIZIO Business Overview
6.3 Samsung
6.3.1 Samsung Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.3.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.3.3 Samsung Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.3.4 Samsung Business Overview
6.4 Yamaha
6.4.1 Yamaha Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.4.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.4.3 Yamaha Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.4.4 Yamaha Business Overview
6.5 Panasonic
6.5.1 Panasonic Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.5.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.5.3 Panasonic Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.5.4 Panasonic Business Overview
6.6 Harman
6.6.1 Harman Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.6.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.6.3 Harman Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.6.4 Harman Business Overview
6.7 Bose
6.7.1 Bose Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.7.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.7.3 Bose Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.7.4 Bose Business Overview
6.8 LG
6.8.1 LG Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.8.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.8.3 LG Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.8.4 LG Business Overview
6.9 Onkyo (Pioneer)
6.9.1 Onkyo (Pioneer) Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.9.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.9.3 Onkyo (Pioneer) Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.9.4 Onkyo (Pioneer) Business Overview
6.10 D+M Group (Sound United)
6.10.1 D+M Group (Sound United) Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.10.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.10.3 D+M Group (Sound United) Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.10.4 D+M Group (Sound United) Business Overview
6.11 VOXX International
6.11.1 VOXX International Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.11.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.11.3 VOXX International Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.11.4 VOXX International Business Overview
6.12 Nortek
6.12.1 Nortek Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.12.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.12.3 Nortek Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.12.4 Nortek Business Overview

Continued…

Providing readers with information on the following topics:
•Emerging keyword market players
•corporate environment
•distribution network
•common products
•manufacturing market participants
•supply-demand analysis
•Other keyword market-related variables.

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market report evaluates factors that could have a significant impact on end-user growth as well as their impact on market production and consumption. Furthermore, the study highlights restraints that hinder Global Aerospace and Defense Market growth during the forecast period (20222029).

Reasons to buy Global Aerospace and Defense Market report:
• For comprehensive market analysis and understanding of the Global Aerospace and Defense Market and its commercial landscape.
• Using Porter’s five forces analysis, Global Aerospace and Defense Market examined various market perspectives.
• The report examines the extent to which stringent emission control standards will drive the Global Aerospace and Defense Market.
• Reducing development risks by assessing manufacturing processes, key issues, and solutions.
• Learn about the most important market drivers and restraints, as well as their impact on the Global Aerospace and Defense Market.
• Understand the main organizations market strategies.
• Recognize the market and its future outlook.
• Global Aerospace and Defense Market offer custom searches based on specific requirements in addition to standard summary reports.
• Examine the industries that are expected to grow the fastest between 2022 and 2029.

Buy this report @ (Price 2980 USD for a single-user license)
https://proficientmarketinsights.com/purchase/20580415

About Us:

Proficient Market Insights is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Contact our Sales Team:

Proficient Market Insights
Phone: US :1 424 253 0807
UK : +44 203 239 8187
Email: [email protected]

IOT-Identity Access Management Market Speed, Utilization, Region, Trend, Statistics, View, Size, Output, forces, Review, Consumption, Capacity Outlook 2022-2029

Embedded Database System Market forces, Consumption, Statistics, Size, Speed, Trend, Region, Utilization, View, Capacity, Review Forecast 2022-2029

Demand Response Management System (DRMS) Market Area, Statistics, View, Trend, Consumption, Application, Region, Capacity, Speed, Geographic, Utilization, Size, Output, forces, Review Outlook 2029

Cosmetic Preservative Market Review, Capacity, View, Output, Utilization, Region, Trend, Speed, Size, Statistics, Consumption, forces Outlook 2022-2029

Acetone Market forces, Consumption, Statistics, View, Output, Application, Utilization, Region, Trend, Capacity, Review Forecast 2022-2029

Magnesium Target Market Review, Consumption, Utilization, View, Trend, forces, Size, Capacity, Region, Statistics, Output, Speed Forecast 2022-2029

Single Coated Adhesive Tapes Market Consumption, Trend, Capacity, Region, Speed, Statistics, Utilization, forces, Size, forces, Application Outlook 2022-2029

Fabricated Structural Steel Market Statistics, Review, forces, Consumption, Capacity, Type, View, Trend, Output, Region, Utilization Forecast 2022-2029

Beta Cyclodextrin Market Region, Trend, Utilization, Speed, Output, Speed, Capacity, Statistics, View, forces, Review consumption Forecast 2022-2029

Mf Uf Membrane Market Region, Trend, Utilization, Speed, Output, Size, View, Statistics, Capacity, Consumption, Review, forces Forecast 2022-2029

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Global Aerospace & Defense Market, Utilization, Trend, Size, Application, Region, Speed, Output, Statistics, Capacity, forces, View, Consumption Forecast 2022-2029

We would like to say thanks to the author of this short article for this remarkable web content

Global Aerospace & Defense Market, Utilization, Trend, Size, Application, Region, Speed, Output, Statistics, Capacity, forces, View, Consumption Forecast 2022-2029 – Digital Journal

";}s:7:"summary";s:1106:"This report studies the Global Aerospace & Defense Market, covering market size for segment by Market Dynamics (Drivers, Restraints and Challenges, Opportunities, etc.), by application (Aircraft and Components Manufacturing, Space, Military, and Other Transportation, Ship Building and Repairing, Radars and Weapon, Other), by Sales Channel (Direct Channel, Distribution Channel), by player (Thales Group, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., BAE ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:31802:"

This report studies the Global Aerospace & Defense Market, covering market size for segment by Market Dynamics (Drivers, Restraints and Challenges, Opportunities, etc.), by application (Aircraft and Components Manufacturing, Space, Military, and Other Transportation, Ship Building and Repairing, Radars and Weapon, Other), by Sales Channel (Direct Channel, Distribution Channel), by player (Thales Group, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd., BAE Systems PLC Raytheon Company) and by region (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America and Middle East & Africa). This report also gives the information about Influence of COVID- 19 Outbreak on Global Aerospace & Defense Market Industry Development.

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market research report provides an assessment of the Global Aerospace and Defense Market, providing an outlook of the global and regional markets in a systematic way. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market study deep-dives into the market’s various dimensions. The report elucidates the following aspects-
• Implementations
• Meanings
• Supply chain management
• Market classification
• Manufacturing operations
• Development plans
• Initial capital investments.

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market latest market analysis surveys the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on the following: Global consumer prices, annual growth rate, and market share. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market study also caters to the audience by providing a clearer understanding of development trends, the growth standing of major regions, and an overview of the business outlook.

Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on this industry

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market primary goal of this research is to provide information on the post-COVID-19 impact that will aid market participants in this field in evaluating their business strategies. In addition, Global Aerospace and Defense Market segmentation by main market players, kinds, applications/end users, and geography is included in this study (United States, Europe (Russia, Germany, UK, Poland , France, Italy, Spain) India, China, Japan, Southeast Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand), Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia), Middle East and Africa (United Arab, Egypt, Emirates, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Nigeria) and Others).

Top Players covered in Aerospace and Defense Market report:

Get a sample copy of the report @ https://proficientmarketinsights.com/enquiry/request-sample/20580415

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market research report is the outcome of inductive studies on the industry’s dynamics that are shaping the growth prevailing and future situations by evaluating the market by market share, geography, and size in terms of volume and value. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market research report provides market classifications, applications, major supply chain structures, and principles. The study also scrutinizes the various forces of the Global Aerospace and Defense Market affecting product demand, vital sub-segments, revenue for the base year and the forecast period (20222029), and significant issues faced by the market players.

Aerospace and Defense Segmentation Covers:

This report displays the price, market share, growth rate, production, revenue of Global Aerospace and Defense Market types split into:

Aerospace and Defense Application Covers:

This report focuses on the status and outlook for sales volume, growth rate, market share, Global Aerospace and Defense Market application includes:

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market highlights trends and regions where they do business. Evidence-based data on the COVID-19 pandemic on market value, sales share, and projected growth rates for each segment is also mentioned in the report. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market business report also includes the market’s construction with respect to recent trends and the adoption of technological innovations by key players. The Global Aerospace and Defense Market report aims to provide insightful data regarding the competitive environment to strategic consumers gearing to gain a competitive advantage in the Global Aerospace and Defense Market.

Global Aerospace and Defense Market report answers the following questions:
• Detailed Overview of Global Aerospace and Defense Market will help deliver clients and businesses making strategies.
• Influencing factors that thriving demand and latest trend running in the market.
• What is the market concentration? Is it fragmented or highly concentrated?
• What trends, challenges and barriers will impact the development and sizing of Global Aerospace and Defense Market?
• SWOT Analysis of each defined key players along with its profile and Porter’s five forces tool mechanism to compliment the same.
• What growth momentum or acceleration market carries during the forecast period?
• Which region may tap highest market share in coming era?
• Which application/end-user category or Product Type may seek incremental growth prospects?
• What focused approach and constraints are holding the Global Aerospace and Defense Market?

Have a query before purchasing this report @ https://proficientmarketinsights.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/20580415

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market study contains historical statistics and a general overview of revenues over the forecast period (20222029). The record focuses on various Global Aerospace and Defense Market categories to provide revenue-generating opportunities to stakeholders.

Regions Covered in Global Aerospace and Defense Market Report:
United States
Europe (UK, Germany, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Poland)
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam)
Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia)
Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria)
Other Regions

Global Aerospace and Defense Market Report Highlights:
• Volume, consumption forecast and market value forecast from 2022-2029
• To present the top Global Aerospace and Defense Market players, their company profiles, product portfolio, market share, and revenue analysis
• Top regions of Global Aerospace and Defense Market, SWOT analysis, opportunities and threats to market development are explained
• To investigate the various applications, product types, market value, and manufacturing capacity.
• Flashlight the business potential, import-export status, production, and expenditure analysis
• The mergers and properties, probability analysis, and analyst views and opinions are given
• Breakdown and planning of Global Aerospace and Defense Market based on status, value and market size
• Global Aerospace and Defense Market industry chain structure, manufacturing base, raw material cost, and marketing channel analysis is covered
• Presents strategic recommendations to the new Global Aerospace and Defense Market participants
• Company profiles, strategies, mergers and acquisitions, financial status, and feasibility analysis are described

Global Aerospace and Defense Market Summary

The report focuses on the Aerospace and Defense market size, segment size (mainly covering product type, application, and geography), competitor landscape, recent status, and development trends. Furthermore, the report provides detailed cost analysis, supply chain.

Technological innovation and advancement will further optimize the performance of the product, making it more widely used in downstream applications. Moreover, Consumer behavior analysis and market dynamics (drivers, restraints, opportunities) provides crucial information for knowing the Aerospace and Defense market.

Key players in the global Aerospace and Defense market covered in Chapter 2 and Chapter 6:
Thales Group
Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
BAE Systems PLC Raytheon Company
Northrop Grumman Corporation
General Dynamics Corporation
GE Aviation
Lockheed Martin
Airbus Group
United Technologies Corp.
Boeing

In Chapter 8 and Chapter 10.3, based on types, the Aerospace and Defense market from 2017 to 2029 is primarily split into:
Aerospace
Defense

In Chapter 9 and Chapter 10.4, based on applications, the Aerospace and Defense market from 2017 to 2029 covers:
Aircraft and Components Manufacturing
Space, Military, and Other Transportation
Ship Building and Repairing
Radars and Weapon
Other

Geographically, the report includes the research on production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate, and forecast (2017 -2029) of the following regions:
United States
Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Spain, Russia, Poland)
China
Japan
India
Southeast Asia (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam)
Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Colombia)
Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Egypt, South Africa, Nigeria)
Other Regions

Chapter 1 provides an overview of Aerospace and Defense market, containing global revenue and CAGR. The forecast and analysis of Aerospace and Defense market by type, application, and region are also presented in this chapter.

Chapter 2 is about the market landscape and major players. It provides competitive situation and market concentration status along with the basic information of these players.

Chapter 3 introduces the industrial chain of Aerospace and Defense. Industrial chain analysis, raw material (suppliers, price, supply and demand, market concentration rate) and downstream buyers are analyzed in this chapter.

Chapter 4 concentrates on manufacturing analysis, including cost structure analysis and process analysis, making up a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing cost.

Chapter 5 provides clear insights into market dynamics, the influence of COVID-19 in Aerospace and Defense industry, consumer behavior analysis.

Chapter 6 provides a full-scale analysis of major players in Aerospace and Defense industry. The basic information, as well as the profiles, applications and specifications of products market performance along with Business Overview are offered.

Chapter 7 pays attention to the sales, revenue, price and gross margin of Aerospace and Defense in markets of different regions. The analysis on sales, revenue, price and gross margin of the global market is covered in this part.

Chapter 8 gives a worldwide view of Aerospace and Defense market. It includes sales, revenue, price, market share and the growth rate by type.

Chapter 9 focuses on the application of Aerospace and Defense, by analyzing the consumption and its growth rate of each application.

Chapter 10 prospects the whole Aerospace and Defense market, including the global sales and revenue forecast, regional forecast. It also foresees the Aerospace and Defense market by type and application.

Years considered for this report:
Historical Years: 2017-2021
Base Year: 2021
Estimated Year: 2022
Forecast Period: 2022-2029

Key Points Profiled in the Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industry Report:

The report offers readers an analysis of the industry landscape, enabling them to assess the Global Aerospace and Defense Market head-to-head competition, sales, promotional and marketing experience, price strategy, product range and distribution overview.

Major Points from TOC:
1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Global Aerospace and Defense Market
1.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Sales and CAGR (%) Comparison by Type (2017-2029)
1.2.2 The Market Profile of Home Theatre in-a-box (HTiB)
1.2.3 The Market Profile of Home Audio Speakers and Systems
1.2.4 The Market Profile of Others
1.3 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Consumption (Sales) Comparison by Application (2017-2029)
1.3.2 The Market Profile of Use for TVs
1.3.3 The Market Profile of Use for Computers
1.3.4 The Market Profile of Others
1.4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market, Region Wise (2017-2022)
1.4.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Size (Revenue) and CAGR (%) Comparison by Region (2017-2022)
1.4.2 United States Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3 Europe Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.1 Germany Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.2 UK Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.3 France Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.4 Italy Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.5 Spain Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.6 Russia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.3.7 Poland Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.4 China Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.5 Japan Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.6 India Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7 Southeast Asia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.1 Malaysia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.2 Singapore Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.3 Philippines Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.4 Indonesia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.5 Thailand Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.7.6 Vietnam Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8 Latin America Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.1 Brazil Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.2 Mexico Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.8.3 Colombia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9 Middle East and Africa Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.1 Saudi Arabia Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.2 United Arab Emirates Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.3 Turkey Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.4 Egypt Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.5 South Africa Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.4.9.6 Nigeria Global Aerospace and Defense Market Status and Prospect (2017-2022)
1.5 Global Market Size of Global Aerospace and Defense Market (2017-2029)
1.5.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Revenue Status and Outlook (2017-2029)
1.5.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Sales Status and Outlook (2017-2029)

2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Landscape by Player
2.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Sales and Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Revenue and Market Share by Player (2017-2022)
2.3 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Average Price by Player (2017-2022)
2.4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Gross Margin by Player (2017-2022)
2.5 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type by Player
2.6 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Share of Top 3 and Top 6 Players
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Upstream and Downstream Analysis
3.1 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industrial Chain Analysis
3.2 Key Raw Materials Suppliers and Price Analysis
3.3 Key Raw Materials Supply and Demand Analysis
3.4 Manufacturing Process Analysis
3.5 Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials
3.6 Downstream Buyers
3.7 Value Chain Status under COVID-18

4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Manufacturing Cost Analysis
4.1 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis
4.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Key Raw Materials Cost Analysis
4.2.1 Key Raw Materials Introduction
4.2.2 Price Trend of Key Raw Materials
4.3 Labor Cost Analysis
4.3.1 Labor Cost of Global Aerospace and Defense Market under COVID-19
4.4 Energy Costs Analysis
4.5 RandD Costs Analysis

5 Market Dynamics
5.1 Drivers
5.2 Restraints and Challenges
5.3 Opportunities
5.3.1 Advances in Innovation and Technology for Global Aerospace and Defense Market
5.3.2 Increased Demand in Emerging Markets
5.4 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industry Development Trends under COVID-19 Outbreak
5.4.1 Global COVID-19 Status Overview
5.4.2 Influence of COVID-19 Outbreak on Global Aerospace and Defense Market Industry Development
5.5 Consumer Behavior Analysis

6 Players Profiles
6.1 Sony
6.1.1 Sony Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.1.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.1.3 Sony Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.1.4 Sony Business Overview
6.2 VIZIO
6.2.1 VIZIO Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.2.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.2.3 VIZIO Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.2.4 VIZIO Business Overview
6.3 Samsung
6.3.1 Samsung Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.3.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.3.3 Samsung Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.3.4 Samsung Business Overview
6.4 Yamaha
6.4.1 Yamaha Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.4.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.4.3 Yamaha Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.4.4 Yamaha Business Overview
6.5 Panasonic
6.5.1 Panasonic Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.5.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.5.3 Panasonic Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.5.4 Panasonic Business Overview
6.6 Harman
6.6.1 Harman Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.6.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.6.3 Harman Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.6.4 Harman Business Overview
6.7 Bose
6.7.1 Bose Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.7.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.7.3 Bose Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.7.4 Bose Business Overview
6.8 LG
6.8.1 LG Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.8.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.8.3 LG Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.8.4 LG Business Overview
6.9 Onkyo (Pioneer)
6.9.1 Onkyo (Pioneer) Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.9.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.9.3 Onkyo (Pioneer) Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.9.4 Onkyo (Pioneer) Business Overview
6.10 D+M Group (Sound United)
6.10.1 D+M Group (Sound United) Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.10.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.10.3 D+M Group (Sound United) Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.10.4 D+M Group (Sound United) Business Overview
6.11 VOXX International
6.11.1 VOXX International Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.11.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.11.3 VOXX International Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.11.4 VOXX International Business Overview
6.12 Nortek
6.12.1 Nortek Basic Information, Manufacturing Base, Sales Area and Competitors
6.12.2 Global Aerospace and Defense Market Product Profiles, Application and Specification
6.12.3 Nortek Global Aerospace and Defense Market Performance (2017-2022)
6.12.4 Nortek Business Overview

Continued…

Providing readers with information on the following topics:
•Emerging keyword market players
•corporate environment
•distribution network
•common products
•manufacturing market participants
•supply-demand analysis
•Other keyword market-related variables.

The Global Aerospace and Defense Market report evaluates factors that could have a significant impact on end-user growth as well as their impact on market production and consumption. Furthermore, the study highlights restraints that hinder Global Aerospace and Defense Market growth during the forecast period (20222029).

Reasons to buy Global Aerospace and Defense Market report:
• For comprehensive market analysis and understanding of the Global Aerospace and Defense Market and its commercial landscape.
• Using Porter’s five forces analysis, Global Aerospace and Defense Market examined various market perspectives.
• The report examines the extent to which stringent emission control standards will drive the Global Aerospace and Defense Market.
• Reducing development risks by assessing manufacturing processes, key issues, and solutions.
• Learn about the most important market drivers and restraints, as well as their impact on the Global Aerospace and Defense Market.
• Understand the main organizations market strategies.
• Recognize the market and its future outlook.
• Global Aerospace and Defense Market offer custom searches based on specific requirements in addition to standard summary reports.
• Examine the industries that are expected to grow the fastest between 2022 and 2029.

Buy this report @ (Price 2980 USD for a single-user license)
https://proficientmarketinsights.com/purchase/20580415

About Us:

Proficient Market Insights is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Contact our Sales Team:

Proficient Market Insights
Phone: US :1 424 253 0807
UK : +44 203 239 8187
Email: [email protected]

IOT-Identity Access Management Market Speed, Utilization, Region, Trend, Statistics, View, Size, Output, forces, Review, Consumption, Capacity Outlook 2022-2029

Embedded Database System Market forces, Consumption, Statistics, Size, Speed, Trend, Region, Utilization, View, Capacity, Review Forecast 2022-2029

Demand Response Management System (DRMS) Market Area, Statistics, View, Trend, Consumption, Application, Region, Capacity, Speed, Geographic, Utilization, Size, Output, forces, Review Outlook 2029

Cosmetic Preservative Market Review, Capacity, View, Output, Utilization, Region, Trend, Speed, Size, Statistics, Consumption, forces Outlook 2022-2029

Acetone Market forces, Consumption, Statistics, View, Output, Application, Utilization, Region, Trend, Capacity, Review Forecast 2022-2029

Magnesium Target Market Review, Consumption, Utilization, View, Trend, forces, Size, Capacity, Region, Statistics, Output, Speed Forecast 2022-2029

Single Coated Adhesive Tapes Market Consumption, Trend, Capacity, Region, Speed, Statistics, Utilization, forces, Size, forces, Application Outlook 2022-2029

Fabricated Structural Steel Market Statistics, Review, forces, Consumption, Capacity, Type, View, Trend, Output, Region, Utilization Forecast 2022-2029

Beta Cyclodextrin Market Region, Trend, Utilization, Speed, Output, Speed, Capacity, Statistics, View, forces, Review consumption Forecast 2022-2029

Mf Uf Membrane Market Region, Trend, Utilization, Speed, Output, Size, View, Statistics, Capacity, Consumption, Review, forces Forecast 2022-2029

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Global Aerospace & Defense Market, Utilization, Trend, Size, Application, Region, Speed, Output, Statistics, Capacity, forces, View, Consumption Forecast 2022-2029

We would like to say thanks to the author of this short article for this remarkable web content

Global Aerospace & Defense Market, Utilization, Trend, Size, Application, Region, Speed, Output, Statistics, Capacity, forces, View, Consumption Forecast 2022-2029 – Digital Journal

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1650876433;}i:8;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:55:"What a toxic inferno like Venus can tell us about Earth";s:4:"link";s:85:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/what-a-toxic-inferno-like-venus-can-tell-us-about-earth/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Sun, 24 Apr 2022 20:46:17 +0000";s:8:"category";s:27:"SpaceEarthinfernotoxicVenus";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=41108";s:11:"description";s:588:"article This global view of the surface of Venus was created using data from NASA’s Magellan spacecraft with data gaps filled in with Pioneer Venus Orbiter data. The simulated hues are based on color images recorded by the Soviet Venera 13 and 14 spacecraft. Venus is a fiery world with sulfuric acid clouds and a ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:6887:"

This global view of the surface of Venus was created using data from NASA’s Magellan spacecraft with data gaps filled in with Pioneer Venus Orbiter data. The simulated hues are based on color images recorded by the Soviet Venera 13 and 14 spacecraft.

Venus is a fiery world with sulfuric acid clouds and a toxic atmosphere fueled by a runaway greenhouse effect, but scientists believe that about 800 million years ago, it could have been more like Earth.

Earth is a true gem of our solar system, with a perfect distance from the sun to support life and a temperature to keep liquid water. Our closest rocky neighbor, Venus, is also within the area known as the “Goldilocks Zone,” but with temperatures at 900 degrees Fahrenheit, no one or thing is living there now.

At some point in its evolution, Venus lost its potential to be habitable. 

NASA’S NEXT EARTH MISSIONS WILL MONITOR EXTREME WEATHER, TAKE FIRST GLOBAL SURVEY OF SURFACE WATER

With a series of planned NASA, European Space Agency, and privately funded spacecraft missions to Venus, the planet hot enough to melt lead might soon be the bell of the solar system ball – at least it will be to climate and planetary scientists. 

NASA’s VERITAS mission is launching to Venus no earlier than 2027. The spacecraft will orbit Venus and use a suite of instruments to map the planet and provide radar images. 

Venus has interesting geological features, including volcanoes, craters and mountains. VERITAS will look for the composition of these features and help determine how they formed. 

The biggest goal of the mission is to find out why Venus doesn’t have the same qualities to support life as Earth when it’s also a rocky planet around the same size and within the habitable zone of the sun.

“Using cutting-edge technologies that NASA has developed and refined over many years of missions and technology programs, we’re ushering in a new decade of Venus to understand how an Earth-like planet can become a hothouse,” NASA’s associate administrator for science Thomas Zurbuchen said in a statement.

Venus is a spacecraft killer. The former Soviet Union and NASA have sent a series of probes to Venus, and all died soon after arrival.

‘IT’S THE TREE EVERYONE ROOTS FOR’: WASHINGTON’S ‘TREE OF LIFE’ CLINGS TO SURVIVAL AGAINST ALL ODDS

davincinadirprobealpha.jpg

An artist rendering of DAVINCI, a meter-diameter probe that will brave the high temperatures and pressures near Venus’ surface to explore the atmosphere from above the clouds to near the surface. (Credits: NASA GSFC visualization by CI Labs Michael L

NASA plans to send a probe part of the DAVINCI mission down to the Venusian surface. The probe will collect measurements on the way down. 

The meter-wide probe contains the Venus Mass Spectrometer, which will ingest gas from the atmosphere and quickly analyze it.

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Chief of Planetary Environments Lab Charles Malespin says the VMS instrument is “essentially like sending a complex chemistry lab squished down to the size of a briefcase.”

If it survives the descent down to the hellish world, the data from the surface will be a bonus. However, NASA says it’s unlikely the probe will survive long on the 900-degree surface.

In the next decade, the European Space Agency will launch EnVision, which will orbit Venus and investigate the planet’s inner core and its atmosphere. Scientists are interested in looking for evidence of past oceans and understanding active geological processes.

According to computer modeling by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Venus may have had a shallow ocean and habitable surface temperatures in the first 2 billion years of its history.

It’s been over 30 years since NASA sent a mission to Venus, and private company Rocket Lab might be the agency to it.

Rocket Lab also plans to send a spacecraft to Venus in 2023. 

LINK: Get updates and more on this story at foxweather.com.

We wish to say thanks to the writer of this write-up for this incredible content

What a toxic inferno like Venus can tell us about Earth

";}s:7:"summary";s:588:"article This global view of the surface of Venus was created using data from NASA’s Magellan spacecraft with data gaps filled in with Pioneer Venus Orbiter data. The simulated hues are based on color images recorded by the Soviet Venera 13 and 14 spacecraft. Venus is a fiery world with sulfuric acid clouds and a ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:6887:"

This global view of the surface of Venus was created using data from NASA’s Magellan spacecraft with data gaps filled in with Pioneer Venus Orbiter data. The simulated hues are based on color images recorded by the Soviet Venera 13 and 14 spacecraft.

Venus is a fiery world with sulfuric acid clouds and a toxic atmosphere fueled by a runaway greenhouse effect, but scientists believe that about 800 million years ago, it could have been more like Earth.

Earth is a true gem of our solar system, with a perfect distance from the sun to support life and a temperature to keep liquid water. Our closest rocky neighbor, Venus, is also within the area known as the “Goldilocks Zone,” but with temperatures at 900 degrees Fahrenheit, no one or thing is living there now.

At some point in its evolution, Venus lost its potential to be habitable. 

NASA’S NEXT EARTH MISSIONS WILL MONITOR EXTREME WEATHER, TAKE FIRST GLOBAL SURVEY OF SURFACE WATER

With a series of planned NASA, European Space Agency, and privately funded spacecraft missions to Venus, the planet hot enough to melt lead might soon be the bell of the solar system ball – at least it will be to climate and planetary scientists. 

NASA’s VERITAS mission is launching to Venus no earlier than 2027. The spacecraft will orbit Venus and use a suite of instruments to map the planet and provide radar images. 

Venus has interesting geological features, including volcanoes, craters and mountains. VERITAS will look for the composition of these features and help determine how they formed. 

The biggest goal of the mission is to find out why Venus doesn’t have the same qualities to support life as Earth when it’s also a rocky planet around the same size and within the habitable zone of the sun.

“Using cutting-edge technologies that NASA has developed and refined over many years of missions and technology programs, we’re ushering in a new decade of Venus to understand how an Earth-like planet can become a hothouse,” NASA’s associate administrator for science Thomas Zurbuchen said in a statement.

Venus is a spacecraft killer. The former Soviet Union and NASA have sent a series of probes to Venus, and all died soon after arrival.

‘IT’S THE TREE EVERYONE ROOTS FOR’: WASHINGTON’S ‘TREE OF LIFE’ CLINGS TO SURVIVAL AGAINST ALL ODDS

davincinadirprobealpha.jpg

An artist rendering of DAVINCI, a meter-diameter probe that will brave the high temperatures and pressures near Venus’ surface to explore the atmosphere from above the clouds to near the surface. (Credits: NASA GSFC visualization by CI Labs Michael L

NASA plans to send a probe part of the DAVINCI mission down to the Venusian surface. The probe will collect measurements on the way down. 

The meter-wide probe contains the Venus Mass Spectrometer, which will ingest gas from the atmosphere and quickly analyze it.

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Chief of Planetary Environments Lab Charles Malespin says the VMS instrument is “essentially like sending a complex chemistry lab squished down to the size of a briefcase.”

If it survives the descent down to the hellish world, the data from the surface will be a bonus. However, NASA says it’s unlikely the probe will survive long on the 900-degree surface.

In the next decade, the European Space Agency will launch EnVision, which will orbit Venus and investigate the planet’s inner core and its atmosphere. Scientists are interested in looking for evidence of past oceans and understanding active geological processes.

According to computer modeling by NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Venus may have had a shallow ocean and habitable surface temperatures in the first 2 billion years of its history.

It’s been over 30 years since NASA sent a mission to Venus, and private company Rocket Lab might be the agency to it.

Rocket Lab also plans to send a spacecraft to Venus in 2023. 

LINK: Get updates and more on this story at foxweather.com.

We wish to say thanks to the writer of this write-up for this incredible content

What a toxic inferno like Venus can tell us about Earth

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1650833177;}i:9;a:11:{s:5:"title";s:58:"Space News: Taking the pulse of NASA’s robotic explorers";s:4:"link";s:84:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/space/space-news-taking-the-pulse-of-nasas-robotic-explorers/";s:2:"dc";a:1:{s:7:"creator";s:12:"Paula Hooper";}s:7:"pubdate";s:31:"Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:44:58 +0000";s:8:"category";s:40:"SpaceexplorersNASAsnewspulseroboticspace";s:4:"guid";s:31:"https://fuzzyskunk.com/?p=40987";s:11:"description";s:664:"Europa, an icy Moon of Jupiter, entices scientists to explore a huge ocean beneath an icy surface. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute. Keeping NASA’s robotic explorers healthy takes smart software, especially in remote and harsh environments. An initial investment by NASA’s Small Business Innovation Research, or SBIR, Program led to development of a new technology that ... Read more";s:7:"content";a:1:{s:7:"encoded";s:10333:"
monsid1
Europa, an icy Moon of Jupiter, entices scientists to explore a huge ocean beneath an icy surface. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute.

Keeping NASA’s robotic explorers healthy takes smart software, especially in remote and harsh environments.

An initial investment by NASA’s Small Business Innovation Research, or SBIR, Program led to development of a new technology that may enable robotic exploration of distant destinations in our solar system.

Europa, an intriguing moon of Jupiter, has an icy surface and evidence of a liquid ocean underneath that likely contains more water than the Earth’s oceans. Arthur C. Clarke recognized its uniqueness in his novel 2010: Odyssey Two with the memorable passage “All these worlds are yours.

Except Europa. Attempt no landing there,” as a warning to future explorers to protect that world for possible evolution of life. Scientists believe life may be possible on Europa if liquid water and favorable chemical elements exist.

But we must get closer to confirm their presence – and exploring Europa is a formidable challenge. Given Europa’s distinctive characteristics, how can we not explore this fascinating destination?

To answer this call, NASA is developing concepts for robotic explorers that will land on Europa and search for signs of life by sampling the ice and possibly the ocean below. Europa’s surface is a forbidding place, with temperatures below –260°F and bathed in strong radiation that can disrupt electronics.

Europa also is so far from Earth that it would be difficult to manage a robot’s activities on an hourly or even a daily basis. (It will take approximately 50 minutes for a signal from Earth to reach any robotic explorer that NASA deploys there.)

One solution is to make our robotic explorers smarter and more autonomous, so that they can detect and handle issues without human intervention.

One crucial aspect of autonomy is the ability for a robot to check its hardware for problems, determine if something is not working properly, and pinpoint the faulty component.

NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, or JPL, is working with a small company called Okean Solutions, Inc. to develop this capability that could one day be used on missions to challenging space environments such as Europa.

Okean’s MONSID (Model-based Off-Nominal State Identification and Detection) software checks the health of a system by comparing onboard measurements to simulations or models of the expected behavior. MONSID verifies correct behavior, detects when something is amiss, and then identifies which piece of hardware is not operating properly.

This “model-based” approach uses the constraint suspension technique — an analytical approach developed for use on digital systems by Professors Randy Davis and Howie Schrobe at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT.

While working on her dissertation at the University of California, Los Angeles, Lorraine Fesq extended this capability to work with analog values such as the temperatures, voltages, and currents that are found on robotic systems.

Ksenia Kolcio and Maurice Prather, Vice President and President of Okean Solutions respectively, subsequently developed and matured MONSID through several NASA and Air Force SBIR-funded efforts. MONSID has demonstrated its versatility through deployments on hardware testbeds at JPL, the California Institute of Technology, and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

In one MONSID application, an engineering team led by Ryan Mackey at JPL worked with Okean Solutions to model the mobility system of Athena, a JPL development rover used to prove new robotic technologies.

monsid2
JPL and Okean Solutions engineers tested the MONSID software on the Athena rover in the JPL Mars Yard, diagnosing both intentional and unexpected faults, as part of JPL’s Self-Reliant Rover project. From left to right: Joe Russino, Dan Gaines (SRR lead), Ryan Mackey (MONSID task lead), Vincent Wong, Gary Doran, Jacek Sawoniewicz, Maurice Prather (Okean President), Heather Justice, Ksenia Kolcio (Okean VP), Issa Nesnas, Lorraine Fesq. Photo courtesy of Chad Edwards, JPL/Caltech.

Modeling began as the rover was refurbished with new components, and tests with the upgraded rover yielded surprising results. The team conducted Athena rover test drives in the Mars Yard at JPL and compared data collected from the rover’s mobility system to predictions from the MONSID models.

Several discrepancies were observed. Initially, the team suspected that the discrepancies were due to modeling errors, but further analysis revealed several new issues with the rover itself.

These problems included mismatches in top-level motion commands versus position commands seen by the motor controllers; off-nominal responses to commands, resulting in arc motion when straight-line driving was commanded; and motor polarity mismatches between reported steer angle and commands, which resulted in having the motors sent back to the vendor for corrections.

The remaining issues were resolved by updating the software and motor controller firmware on the rover, as well as tuning motor controller parameters. This exercise demonstrates how the MONSID model-based approach offers smarter, more autonomous capabilities to assess hardware health and performance, even as systems are developed before deployment.

Once the Athena rover was completed and checked for correct behavior, the team injected faults to simulate motor stalls and incorrect wheel commands to test MONSID performance under real-world conditions.

For example, the team introduced a simulated bit flip that reversed the polarity of a command to one of the steering motors during a commanded drive along an arc.

This condition resulted in one wheel turning to the right instead of the left, causing that wheel to drag across the Mars Yard. The rover telemetry data appeared fine despite the faulty command; in fact, the rover still reached its drive goal because the five other wheels compensated for the one that was dragging.

In the Mars Yard, the engineers were able to visually see the wheel being dragged, but if the rover was on the surface of another planetary body, the fault would not show up in the telemetry data, making it difficult to detect, let alone diagnose. Left undetected, a dragging wheel could lead to severe wheel damage.

Traditional limit-checking approaches would be challenged to detect this type of fault because all onboard measurements stayed within limits. By capturing the intended coordination between all six wheels, MONSID was able to detect and isolate this fault immediately, unlike traditional monitor-response methods for detecting faults.

These results highlight the benefits of MONSID’s model-based approach. Using MONSID, engineers can ensure not only that the right system is built before deployment on its mission to a distant location, but that the hardware health can be autonomously assessed throughout the mission.

Currently, the JPL team is building MONSID models for deployment on two new robotic systems. The first, funded by NASA PSD’s Concepts for Ocean worlds Life Detection Technology, or COLDTech, program, will diagnose the hardware of a robotic arm designed to scoop materials from the surface of icy worlds such as Europa and Saturn’s moon Enceladus.

On a COLDTech task titled REASIMO (Robust, Explainable Autonomy for Scientific Icy Moon Operations), MONSID will be deployed on two robotic arm testbeds funded by NASA’s Planetary Exploration Science Technology Office (PESTO): The Ocean Worlds Autonomy Testbed for Exploration Research and Simulation (OCEANWaters) software testbed developed at NASA Ames, and the Ocean Worlds Lander Autonomy Testbed (OWLAT) hardware testbed developed at JPL.

For the second task, funded by NASA SMD through JPL’s Type II office, the MONSID team will prototype diagnostic models of spacecraft power and attitude control subsystems for NASA’s Lunar Flashlight CubeSat, scheduled for launch later this year.

These models will support pre-launch testing of the spacecraft, with a vision to upload the MONSID models and engine during the extended mission after the primary mission goals have been accomplished. What began as an SBIR investment has now led to an opportunity for MONSID to truly spread its wings, as an in-space demonstration paves the way for autonomy to enable challenging and exciting new missions.

The research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004).

monsid3
MONSID can detect faults that are missed by traditional limit-checking systems. In this picture, MONSID detected a steering command fault that caused a wheel to be dragged. This type of fault, if undetected, could lead to serious problems. Photo courtesy of Ksenia Kolcio, Okean Solutions.

We want to say thanks to the author of this short article for this awesome material

Space News: Taking the pulse of NASA’s robotic explorers

";}s:7:"summary";s:664:"Europa, an icy Moon of Jupiter, entices scientists to explore a huge ocean beneath an icy surface. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute. Keeping NASA’s robotic explorers healthy takes smart software, especially in remote and harsh environments. An initial investment by NASA’s Small Business Innovation Research, or SBIR, Program led to development of a new technology that ... Read more";s:12:"atom_content";s:10333:"
monsid1
Europa, an icy Moon of Jupiter, entices scientists to explore a huge ocean beneath an icy surface. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SETI Institute.

Keeping NASA’s robotic explorers healthy takes smart software, especially in remote and harsh environments.

An initial investment by NASA’s Small Business Innovation Research, or SBIR, Program led to development of a new technology that may enable robotic exploration of distant destinations in our solar system.

Europa, an intriguing moon of Jupiter, has an icy surface and evidence of a liquid ocean underneath that likely contains more water than the Earth’s oceans. Arthur C. Clarke recognized its uniqueness in his novel 2010: Odyssey Two with the memorable passage “All these worlds are yours.

Except Europa. Attempt no landing there,” as a warning to future explorers to protect that world for possible evolution of life. Scientists believe life may be possible on Europa if liquid water and favorable chemical elements exist.

But we must get closer to confirm their presence – and exploring Europa is a formidable challenge. Given Europa’s distinctive characteristics, how can we not explore this fascinating destination?

To answer this call, NASA is developing concepts for robotic explorers that will land on Europa and search for signs of life by sampling the ice and possibly the ocean below. Europa’s surface is a forbidding place, with temperatures below –260°F and bathed in strong radiation that can disrupt electronics.

Europa also is so far from Earth that it would be difficult to manage a robot’s activities on an hourly or even a daily basis. (It will take approximately 50 minutes for a signal from Earth to reach any robotic explorer that NASA deploys there.)

One solution is to make our robotic explorers smarter and more autonomous, so that they can detect and handle issues without human intervention.

One crucial aspect of autonomy is the ability for a robot to check its hardware for problems, determine if something is not working properly, and pinpoint the faulty component.

NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, or JPL, is working with a small company called Okean Solutions, Inc. to develop this capability that could one day be used on missions to challenging space environments such as Europa.

Okean’s MONSID (Model-based Off-Nominal State Identification and Detection) software checks the health of a system by comparing onboard measurements to simulations or models of the expected behavior. MONSID verifies correct behavior, detects when something is amiss, and then identifies which piece of hardware is not operating properly.

This “model-based” approach uses the constraint suspension technique — an analytical approach developed for use on digital systems by Professors Randy Davis and Howie Schrobe at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT.

While working on her dissertation at the University of California, Los Angeles, Lorraine Fesq extended this capability to work with analog values such as the temperatures, voltages, and currents that are found on robotic systems.

Ksenia Kolcio and Maurice Prather, Vice President and President of Okean Solutions respectively, subsequently developed and matured MONSID through several NASA and Air Force SBIR-funded efforts. MONSID has demonstrated its versatility through deployments on hardware testbeds at JPL, the California Institute of Technology, and the Air Force Research Laboratory.

In one MONSID application, an engineering team led by Ryan Mackey at JPL worked with Okean Solutions to model the mobility system of Athena, a JPL development rover used to prove new robotic technologies.

monsid2
JPL and Okean Solutions engineers tested the MONSID software on the Athena rover in the JPL Mars Yard, diagnosing both intentional and unexpected faults, as part of JPL’s Self-Reliant Rover project. From left to right: Joe Russino, Dan Gaines (SRR lead), Ryan Mackey (MONSID task lead), Vincent Wong, Gary Doran, Jacek Sawoniewicz, Maurice Prather (Okean President), Heather Justice, Ksenia Kolcio (Okean VP), Issa Nesnas, Lorraine Fesq. Photo courtesy of Chad Edwards, JPL/Caltech.

Modeling began as the rover was refurbished with new components, and tests with the upgraded rover yielded surprising results. The team conducted Athena rover test drives in the Mars Yard at JPL and compared data collected from the rover’s mobility system to predictions from the MONSID models.

Several discrepancies were observed. Initially, the team suspected that the discrepancies were due to modeling errors, but further analysis revealed several new issues with the rover itself.

These problems included mismatches in top-level motion commands versus position commands seen by the motor controllers; off-nominal responses to commands, resulting in arc motion when straight-line driving was commanded; and motor polarity mismatches between reported steer angle and commands, which resulted in having the motors sent back to the vendor for corrections.

The remaining issues were resolved by updating the software and motor controller firmware on the rover, as well as tuning motor controller parameters. This exercise demonstrates how the MONSID model-based approach offers smarter, more autonomous capabilities to assess hardware health and performance, even as systems are developed before deployment.

Once the Athena rover was completed and checked for correct behavior, the team injected faults to simulate motor stalls and incorrect wheel commands to test MONSID performance under real-world conditions.

For example, the team introduced a simulated bit flip that reversed the polarity of a command to one of the steering motors during a commanded drive along an arc.

This condition resulted in one wheel turning to the right instead of the left, causing that wheel to drag across the Mars Yard. The rover telemetry data appeared fine despite the faulty command; in fact, the rover still reached its drive goal because the five other wheels compensated for the one that was dragging.

In the Mars Yard, the engineers were able to visually see the wheel being dragged, but if the rover was on the surface of another planetary body, the fault would not show up in the telemetry data, making it difficult to detect, let alone diagnose. Left undetected, a dragging wheel could lead to severe wheel damage.

Traditional limit-checking approaches would be challenged to detect this type of fault because all onboard measurements stayed within limits. By capturing the intended coordination between all six wheels, MONSID was able to detect and isolate this fault immediately, unlike traditional monitor-response methods for detecting faults.

These results highlight the benefits of MONSID’s model-based approach. Using MONSID, engineers can ensure not only that the right system is built before deployment on its mission to a distant location, but that the hardware health can be autonomously assessed throughout the mission.

Currently, the JPL team is building MONSID models for deployment on two new robotic systems. The first, funded by NASA PSD’s Concepts for Ocean worlds Life Detection Technology, or COLDTech, program, will diagnose the hardware of a robotic arm designed to scoop materials from the surface of icy worlds such as Europa and Saturn’s moon Enceladus.

On a COLDTech task titled REASIMO (Robust, Explainable Autonomy for Scientific Icy Moon Operations), MONSID will be deployed on two robotic arm testbeds funded by NASA’s Planetary Exploration Science Technology Office (PESTO): The Ocean Worlds Autonomy Testbed for Exploration Research and Simulation (OCEANWaters) software testbed developed at NASA Ames, and the Ocean Worlds Lander Autonomy Testbed (OWLAT) hardware testbed developed at JPL.

For the second task, funded by NASA SMD through JPL’s Type II office, the MONSID team will prototype diagnostic models of spacecraft power and attitude control subsystems for NASA’s Lunar Flashlight CubeSat, scheduled for launch later this year.

These models will support pre-launch testing of the spacecraft, with a vision to upload the MONSID models and engine during the extended mission after the primary mission goals have been accomplished. What began as an SBIR investment has now led to an opportunity for MONSID to truly spread its wings, as an in-space demonstration paves the way for autonomy to enable challenging and exciting new missions.

The research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004).

monsid3
MONSID can detect faults that are missed by traditional limit-checking systems. In this picture, MONSID detected a steering command fault that caused a wheel to be dragged. This type of fault, if undetected, could lead to serious problems. Photo courtesy of Ksenia Kolcio, Okean Solutions.

We want to say thanks to the author of this short article for this awesome material

Space News: Taking the pulse of NASA’s robotic explorers

";s:14:"date_timestamp";i:1650789898;}}s:7:"channel";a:7:{s:5:"title";s:21:"Space – Fuzzy Skunk";s:4:"link";s:22:"https://fuzzyskunk.com";s:13:"lastbuilddate";s:31:"Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:54:25 +0000";s:8:"language";s:5:"en-US";s:2:"sy";a:2:{s:12:"updateperiod";s:9:" hourly ";s:15:"updatefrequency";s:4:" 1 ";}s:9:"generator";s:30:"https://wordpress.org/?v=5.9.3";s:7:"tagline";N;}s:9:"textinput";a:0:{}s:5:"image";a:0:{}s:9:"feed_type";s:3:"RSS";s:12:"feed_version";s:3:"2.0";s:8:"encoding";s:5:"UTF-8";s:16:"_source_encoding";s:0:"";s:5:"ERROR";s:0:"";s:7:"WARNING";s:0:"";s:19:"_CONTENT_CONSTRUCTS";a:6:{i:0;s:7:"content";i:1;s:7:"summary";i:2;s:4:"info";i:3;s:5:"title";i:4;s:7:"tagline";i:5;s:9:"copyright";}s:16:"_KNOWN_ENCODINGS";a:3:{i:0;s:5:"UTF-8";i:1;s:8:"US-ASCII";i:2;s:10:"ISO-8859-1";}s:5:"stack";a:0:{}s:9:"inchannel";b:0;s:6:"initem";b:0;s:9:"incontent";b:0;s:11:"intextinput";b:0;s:7:"inimage";b:0;s:17:"current_namespace";b:0;s:13:"last_modified";s:31:"Mon, 02 May 2022 16:51:04 GMT ";s:4:"etag";s:29:"ADnfuW18NnwSfGRvUlmBdVrt7s4 ";}